N80
Super Member
Farmwithjunk said:Yes, It is entirely possible the data has been assembled in some form, by someone.
No, No one has been able to produce proof of existance.
Sounds like its Area 51, bigfoot or the Loch Ness monster!
Farmwithjunk said:Yes, It is entirely possible the data has been assembled in some form, by someone.
No, No one has been able to produce proof of existance.
Farmwithjunk said:Why indeed
Sometimes the most profound thoughts come from the least likely sources. Right now I'm recalling that "classic" Robbie Benson movie "WAR GAMES". The computer finally deducted that "The only way to win the game was not to play". I now know what that means.
Farmwithjunk said:Yes, It is entirely possible the data has been assembled in some form, by someone.![]()
N80 said:Matthew Broderick, Robbie Benson....what's the difference? Seriously
Farmwithjunk said:You just took the words right outta my mouth.....
patrick_g said:Originally Posted by N80
Matthew Broderick, Robbie Benson....what's the difference? Seriously
As in many other areas of cerebral related processing as evidenced in tasting, discerning color, shades of gray, and other sensory acuity related tests, there is a wide dynamic range in performance ability. What is an obvious difference to those with ability to discern it is invisible to many others.
There are genetically related abilities in taste, smell, and many other sensory and processing related "brain work" that leave some folks with no clue as to the differences being easily noted by others.
No amount of training or practice will enable someone who is predisposed to not be able to perceive differences in presented sensor stimulation to be able to experience what is easily done so by many others. Both populations of individuals, those with and those without the ability to discern the differences, are normal within the context of the general population.
An example: I used to be able to hear bats very clearly, also "ultrasonic alarms" and such (prior to too much exposure to loud sounds) but there is just no good way to explain what something like that sounds like to someone who can't hear it. Similarly, anyone trying to explain the easily (to some) discerned differences between the two actors will not succeed. Either someone can recognize the distinct differences or they can't. Wines are another area like this. Some folks can taste the differences and some can't in similar vintages and might as well be served the $5 stuff instead of the $25 stuff or the $250 stuff because it will all taste the same to them.
Pat
N80 said:Gosh, Mike, I thought the "NO" answer had been rejected outright despite you being cited as the indisputable source for that answer. If the answer is really no, and the 'whys and wherefores' have been exposed then what the heck is all the chatter about?
And as for suspicions of ulterior motives, go back and read the thread. Virtually everyone has assumed some other motive or else why all the talk about unions, labor costs, global economies, imported steel etc etc etc etc......?
I think deep down we're really having more fun fussing than answering questions of any type. Why else would we be at 60+ posts when, as you say, the question has been put to rest?