Most domestic content question

Status
Not open for further replies.
   / Most domestic content question #71  
Farmwithjunk said:
Yes, It is entirely possible the data has been assembled in some form, by someone.

No, No one has been able to produce proof of existance.

Sounds like its Area 51, bigfoot or the Loch Ness monster!:D
 
   / Most domestic content question #72  
Farmwithjunk said:
Why indeed ;)

Sometimes the most profound thoughts come from the least likely sources. Right now I'm recalling that "classic" Robbie Benson movie "WAR GAMES". The computer finally deducted that "The only way to win the game was not to play". I now know what that means.

Maybe you should recall a little harder until you recall the movie this way...

WarGames (1983)
Directed by John Badham. With Matthew Broderick, Dabney Coleman, John Wood. A young man finds a back door into a military central computer using the venerable IMSAI 8080 computer) in which reality ...

Pat ;) ;) ;)
 
   / Most domestic content question #73  
Matthew Broderick, Robbie Benson....what's the difference? Seriously.

But, when it comes to movies from the 80's that assign ridiculous, mythical powers to computers I'll take 'Weird Science' any day. I mean, really, you're a 17 year old boy and you are a computer whiz, what are you going to do, hack into a DoD computer and destroy the plantet....or create your own personal Kelly LeBroc?

195521.jpg
 
   / Most domestic content question #74  
Farmwithjunk said:
Yes, It is entirely possible the data has been assembled in some form, by someone.;)



Actually...this data does exist. The accuracy may be somewhat questionable but it will be real close to actual domestic content.

In my business we make parts for everything from satellites, to passenger trains, armored security carriers for the military to parts for wood stoves.

Because of NAFTA the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Bureau of Customs and Border Protection requires a Certificate of Origin for all parts supplied to the OEM, Government, or sub contractors. For metal we must assign a HS Tariff Classisication Number to that product, we must put the Country of Origin. What percentage is domestic.

An example would be; I currently buy a certain grade of aluminum from Germany. When I fill out my Certificate of Origin for this finale assembly that we build I must show the percentage of it that contains the German material.
So it could be 60% domestic and 40% foreign.

IF you buy a fuel pump from Mexico or Spain, sold it to the OEM or a Sub contractor or used it as part of an assembly and then sold it. It would have to have a HS Tariff Classification Number.

Some companies require a certain percentage of domestic product in their contracts. Some require a percentage of be foreign.

There is a multiplier that companies use to adjust for discrepancies in tariff classifcation numbers. But the final tally should be close.

Same with tractors, if you are a supplier,(which we are) or importer you are required to supply this information.

So, yes this information is available, the OEM will have it. Now getting them to publish this to any one other than the government agency that requires it is a different story.

Please don't beat me up to bad for this info but if I get some free time today I'll pull out some more regs and go over it and share.

David
 
   / Most domestic content question #75  
When I said it was not available, I assumed everyone would know the manufacturers have this information.

Ah yes, Kelly LeBrock :), used to be married to Steven Seagal.
 
   / Most domestic content question #77  
Originally Posted by N80
Matthew Broderick, Robbie Benson....what's the difference? Seriously
Farmwithjunk said:
You just took the words right outta my mouth.....

As in many other areas of cerebral related processing as evidenced in tasting, discerning color, shades of gray, and other sensory acuity related tests, there is a wide dynamic range in performance ability. What is an obvious difference to those with ability to discern it is invisible to many others.

There are genetically related abilities in taste, smell, and many other sensory and processing related "brain work" that leave some folks with no clue as to the differences being easily noted by others.

No amount of training or practice will enable someone who is predisposed to not be able to perceive differences in presented sensor stimulation to be able to experience what is easily done so by many others. Both populations of individuals, those with and those without the ability to discern the differences, are normal within the context of the general population.

An example: I used to be able to hear bats very clearly, also "ultrasonic alarms" and such (prior to too much exposure to loud sounds) but there is just no good way to explain what something like that sounds like to someone who can't hear it. Similarly, anyone trying to explain the easily (to some) discerned differences between the two actors will not succeed. Either someone can recognize the distinct differences or they can't. Wines are another area like this. Some folks can taste the differences and some can't in similar vintages and might as well be served the $5 stuff instead of the $25 stuff or the $250 stuff because it will all taste the same to them.


Pat
 
   / Most domestic content question #78  
David, what are these percentages based on? Weight? Volume? Number of individual parts? See what I'm getting at? If you say tractor 'A' has 25% domestic (USA) content, does that mean that this tractor, which weighs 4000 pounds (for instance) has 1000 pounds of US material in it? Or does it mean that 25% of its parts were made here?

And, lets say the starter is made in Mexico, does the OEM know where the parts of the starter are from? How? That would rely on Mexican regulator honesty and efficiency wouldn't it?

Not arguing, seriously, just curious.

But lets say we do know for absolute fact that 50% of one tractor is US domestic (whether it is weight, parts or whatever) and another tractor is 70% US domestic. How could anyone use this info for any practical purpose unless they expanded this info to include which parts and how they were made and or assembled?

Patrick: What?:D

Really, the powers and thresholds of discernment are going to be tempered by whether or not the 'discernee' gives a rip or not. :D :D (all in fun, man).
 
   / Most domestic content question #79  
patrick_g said:
Originally Posted by N80
Matthew Broderick, Robbie Benson....what's the difference? Seriously

As in many other areas of cerebral related processing as evidenced in tasting, discerning color, shades of gray, and other sensory acuity related tests, there is a wide dynamic range in performance ability. What is an obvious difference to those with ability to discern it is invisible to many others.

There are genetically related abilities in taste, smell, and many other sensory and processing related "brain work" that leave some folks with no clue as to the differences being easily noted by others.

No amount of training or practice will enable someone who is predisposed to not be able to perceive differences in presented sensor stimulation to be able to experience what is easily done so by many others. Both populations of individuals, those with and those without the ability to discern the differences, are normal within the context of the general population.

An example: I used to be able to hear bats very clearly, also "ultrasonic alarms" and such (prior to too much exposure to loud sounds) but there is just no good way to explain what something like that sounds like to someone who can't hear it. Similarly, anyone trying to explain the easily (to some) discerned differences between the two actors will not succeed. Either someone can recognize the distinct differences or they can't. Wines are another area like this. Some folks can taste the differences and some can't in similar vintages and might as well be served the $5 stuff instead of the $25 stuff or the $250 stuff because it will all taste the same to them.


Pat

And often people simply over anylize what they perceive as "the facts" when things are far less complicated than they want to think.

My reference to that movie was in jest. (I view that movie's place in history as significant as I view certain portions of this thread, by the way.) The fact that I don't consider it as a "classic film", nor did I see any of the actors as performing in a "role of a lifetime", I simply drew upon a name I pulled out of thin air. Robbie Benson was in the "prime" of his illustrious carreer about that time in space. War Games was a movie very simular to most of what Robbie Benson would have been involved in. There was/is no "inability to discern" involved.

Plain and simple, I just didn't remember WHO was in that movie because it wasn't all that important. I just remember my son and daughter watching it over and over and over and................

And the most significant lines in that movie were at the end. For me, the significance was the fact that it was FINALLY ending.
 
Last edited:
   / Most domestic content question
  • Thread Starter
#80  
N80 said:
Gosh, Mike, I thought the "NO" answer had been rejected outright despite you being cited as the indisputable source for that answer. If the answer is really no, and the 'whys and wherefores' have been exposed then what the heck is all the chatter about?

And as for suspicions of ulterior motives, go back and read the thread. Virtually everyone has assumed some other motive or else why all the talk about unions, labor costs, global economies, imported steel etc etc etc etc......?

I think deep down we're really having more fun fussing than answering questions of any type. Why else would we be at 60+ posts when, as you say, the question has been put to rest?

Maybe it's because a few of the members who replied to this thread have feelings of paranoia or guilt for buying foreign? :rolleyes:

Or maybe some just can't resist stirring up crap and ruining a thread based on a simple question? :rolleyes:

One thing for sure. It makes this particular member a lot more hesitant to post a simple friendly question on a great website for fear of being attacked again.

Thanks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2016 TAKEUCHI TL8 SKID STEER (A51242)
2016 TAKEUCHI TL8...
New Skid Steer Attachment Plate (A53002)
New Skid Steer...
TEYME 2000 E0L0 GTE10 LOT NUMBER 228 (A53084)
TEYME 2000 E0L0...
2017 Ford F-150 4x4 Ext. Cab Pickup Truck (A51692)
2017 Ford F-150...
Cat TH407C Telehandler (A53472)
Cat TH407C...
16ft T/A Flatbed Equipment Trailer (A50322)
16ft T/A Flatbed...
 
Top