PineRidge
Super Member
Thanks for sending me the TBN link Randy. Your project looks great my friend, you'll be crushing junk autos in no time.
... Got all final welds to the (4) pipes on the upper grapple jaw done earlier ... also bent the 1/4" x 2" flats that are on the inside of the grapple arms and got them tacked into place. I'm pretty pleased with how the bent flats turned out ... it was only my second time using the bender and I was able to make two pieces that were nearly identical. Plus the bender's capacity is only 1/4" x 1 15/16"" ...
After hefting this thing around and it getting heavier and heavier as I added parts I got a little concerned about the weight, so after finishing up for the day I came down to the house and ran some numbers on the total lengths of the materials I used ...
I think I may have a problem ...
Just based on my estimates (which doesn't include the wire used to make the welds) it appears that the upper jaw (including the hydraulic cylinders) will weigh around 185 lbs.
I can reduce that somewhat (11 lbs) by removing one (out of 4) of the pipes (an 1 1/2" Schedule 80) ... but will pick some of that weight back up in 1/4" x 2" flat stock that will needed to be added to "capture and contain" the load.
The 48" W. R. Long root rake/grapple I patterned this after has a listed weight of 325 lbs. Some of the discrepancy may be due to using heavier pipe than what Long uses (Schedule 80 vs. Schedule 40)
So I ran some numbers for the lower rake portion based on the materials I intend to use and I come up with a weight of at least 232 lbs ... and that doesn't include all of the components (probably another 50 lbs) ... I'm thinking that I'm probably in the neighborhood of 475 - 500 lbs as currently designed.
So I may have to put this thing on a diet.
A good chunk of that 232 lbs for the lower rake portion is the SSQA plate (49 lbs)
I have no idea whether W. R. Long includes the attachment points in their listed weights, as they offer both pin-on and SSQA attachment ... and they probably don't weigh the same.
The Titan SSQA plate I'm going to use is an "open" plate (not solid, or full) ... and it has a 3/8" (by 1 1/2" ?) bar that runs the entire length across the top ... part of that could be eliminated (cut off), once I have the two ends of the plate welded into place.
One other possibility to reduce the weight would be to drill out some holes in the arms for the upper jaw in the drill press with Lennox bi-metal holesaws. From what I've read on TBN, this can be done without sacrificing much in the way of strength.
Needless to say, this probably should have been confronted a little better in the design phase ...
Another day in paradise ... :laughing:
Yep, this type is also the best way to mow, IMHO!Xfaxman,
Thanks ... expect a lot of updates over the next few days.
I'm enjoying reading about your mods and addition of the FEL to the Toro ... very cool :thumbsup:
Thanks.
For those that haven't seen it, click the link in my signature for the rest of the story.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I dunno what it is about that type of machine ... but I really like 'em.