There is a concensus of sorts running through this thread. If you have to pile it and can't just snow plow it, seems the FEL is the general choice. Makes sense. For those of us in areas like Maryland which only get the really big snows every 5 or so years, live where the snow actually has a chance to melt, or have the ability to push it back from the travel path as needed, seems the snow plow is generally favored. Makes sense too. A few years back we got 28" here on top of about 6" from a recent storm that didn't melt. I used the little JD325 after about 8" into the big snow. The forecasters kept raising the storm totals so after I got that cleared I went into a plow back mode to make room. Now that's a frame mount plow on a rather light mower. It raises all of 4". Granted, I had to stay in the saddle every 6" or so to keep up, worked it hard but it did suprisingly well. Now if I take and put a FEL mounted front blade on the 3130 around here, I can't imagine 4 or 5' of snow, given my layout, being unmanageable, assuming I got on it soon enough. That said, if I had to transport it then it would be FEL time. No other sensible way.
It's noteworthy that those especially vulnerable to drifting and/or with a need to transport it prefer or require the FEL bucket. Guess those piles get too big to handle, even with a FEL mounted blade. Perhaps it takes longer... or works the equipment harder to push it into piles with a blade?? I wouldn't know on that. /forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif Several of the up North responses still perfered the plow though, so their situtation must be a little different. However, there doesn't seem to be much argument on which is faster if either will work. /forums/images/graemlins/smile.gif
Now I'm getting the picture across region, terrain, etc.
Thanks guys! /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif /forums/images/graemlins/grin.gif