I said 1500 watts not 2000.. That is a number you came up with...
I know. I was just using your "theory", NOT the actual #'s you used.
You seem to be thinking the same as me. You pay for what you use. Nothing more, nothing less.
I was just giving an example to compair to daveomak's theory.
Let me try again.
They way you and I understand it, IF there is a 1000w load on leg 1 and a 500w load on leg 2, we are paying for 1500w correct???
The way daveomack thinks, is that it takes the higher load of 1000w, and "assumes" that leg 2 is the same and bills for 2000w.
Now if we balance leg 2 by adding 500w to it...1000w on leg 1 AND 1000w on leg 2, we would now be paying for 2000w correct?
And in daveomak's theory, adding that 500w to leg 2 wouldnt increase what the meter sees, because it already though leg 2 was @ 1000w.
See what I am saying? I wasnt using your "exact" numbers. Rather your theory of understanding. Which seems to be the same as mine:thumbsup: