CobyRupert
Super Member
Thanks for the feedback, @rScotty and @RjCorazza - this forum has such helpful folks on it!
I am trying to quantify the benefit on different spacer widths and am working on the maths. All I see on the forums is “It’s so much better!”, but no-one has any tangible information like, “On a 15% cross slope, with 2” spacers, it will take X more amount of force to tip the tractor. With 6” spacers, it will take Y amount.” I know I’m weird, but knowing the numbers eases my lack of confidence.
I had them ballast the fronts and rears, giving me about 350# up front and 1,400# more in the rear - no brainer there. And I get that this helps incrementally keeping a lower center of gravity. But, how much is actually gained from 2” spacers? I see the 6% increase in width adding to the leveraged length. But monetary outlay being similar, is it worth risking the perceived mechanical strain on the axles and getting 6” for 18% increase in leverage length?
I know a dork like me has done the calculations, I just can’t find it. If I end up creating it, I will share it. This is the closest thing I found and plan on starting here:
View attachment 1345858
My impatient self is saying, “Well, heck man… just get the 4” set then.”
Ignoring things like “momentum”, reality is like parts of this diagram. Except the height of the COG is just a guess. It can vary by what attachments are connected, they’re raised height or if set on the ground, tire ballast, and the height and weight of the FEL.
But what is true: Once the COG tips so that a vertical line down from it extends to nearly outside of the wheel stance width, the tractor is tipping over. (That is: the line “COG-L” or line “COG-R” becomes vertical)
Because we don’t know your tractors COG height and the initial stance width, we can’t calculate what an additional 2” or 4” width means in additional tipping degrees it takes to move the COG to the left or right, outside of the wheel stance. Otherwise, it’s geometry.
Last edited: