When is rear ballast needed with a FEL?

   / When is rear ballast needed with a FEL? #61  
After looking at your pictures and having followed the thread for a while, I'm convinced that you have the wrong loader for that tractor (sounds like you are, too).

I almost always have a counterweight on my tractor, but I have lifted at least a couple hundred pounds with the loader with no rear weight (although my tires are loaded). And I can turn the front tires, with the bucket loaded, and I *don't* have power steering.

A "no return" policy doesn't make sense to me when you're looking at a very expensive peice of equipment that can be potentially lethal when not matched correctly to your tractor. You should put something in writing that stresses your concern for your safety (as well as damage to your tractor) and it might be worth it to find an attorney and have them send something. Letters from attorneys seem to get better results than letters from us'n /forums/images/graemlins/crazy.gif.

I'll be staying tuned for the next installment... Good luck!
 
   / When is rear ballast needed with a FEL? #62  
<font color="blue">...(took a long lunch)... </font>

Hey Danny,

When do you work...? /forums/images/graemlins/shocked.gif

(I want a job just like yours...)
/forums/images/graemlins/laugh.gif
 
   / When is rear ballast needed with a FEL?
  • Thread Starter
#63  
John - If I keep this up, I won't have one! /forums/images/graemlins/shocked.gif
 
   / When is rear ballast needed with a FEL?
  • Thread Starter
#64  
I'm afraid a lawyer will cost me more that I would lose on my own. I talked to the Bush Hog sales manager, Jimmy, yesterday and he said they do not accept returns. He said he would be willing to work with my dealer and try to help them resell it if I could get my dealer to take it back. He said he would call the local sales guy, Bill, and have him get together with my dealer and set up a time to come out to my house and observe the situation I'm complaining about.

So, my dealer, John, called me this morning to schedule a time for him and the local BH guy to come out to my house. I told him what the other NH dealer said about not needing any rear ballast for the 7308 and John did not agree. He said I should have about 300 lbs, such as the wheel weights, or add a weight box to the 3pt. I told him what the BH engineer, Scott, said about them having a TC29D with a M246 and that they could lift 700 lbs without any rear weight. So, I said if the local BH sales guy can come out and prove that to me, then I'd be satisfied. John said there was no reason to waste anyone's time on doing that, because the loader is not going to pick up 700 lbs without any rear ballast.

So, I finally just said to John, "Hey look, I made a mistake getting this M246. I should have waited until I had the extra $1000 and bought the 7308. What will it cost me to get out from under this? I'm willing to take a loss and do whatever it takes to get it off my tractor." John said he would have to work with his boss on what he could do. So, now I'm just waiting.
 
   / When is rear ballast needed with a FEL? #65  
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( If I can return the M246, I'll look closer at the Woods 1012/1016, but certainly won't buy one unless I can see one in the flesh or see some good pictures of one mounted on a TC25/29/33 or the Case equivalent of them (which I think is the DX25/29/33).)</font>

I've got a Woods 1012 mounted on my TC33D and have found it a good match. I'll dig up some pictures, if you are still considering it. IMO, the 1016 is a bit much for the NH TC25/29/33 (although my dealer did say he mounted one on a TC33D once at the insistence of one of his customers).

John Mc
 
   / When is rear ballast needed with a FEL?
  • Thread Starter
#66  
John_Mc, I have no doubt that the Woods 1012 is nice loader. But, I'm really gun shy at this point and just don't feel comfortable with getting anything but a New Holland OEM FEL. Pictures would be great though, just to satisfy my curiousity and for the benefit of anyone else here at TBN.

I called the Bush Hog sales manager, Jimmy, again this morning. I told him the following:

Quote

The main problem is that the loader itself weighs over 500 lbs more than other loaders that are mounted on a TC29D, such as the New Holland 7308 or the Woods 1012, which means I have to add an extra 500 lbs on the back of my tractor to make it useable and safe. That means my tractor would weigh an extra 1000 lbs, which is not what I wanted. I understand that a big part of that extra weight is in the mounting kit which is on the tractor, but some of it is in front of the front tires and most of it is not very far back behind the front tires, only about a foot, so it's doing very little to help balance the tractor.

I don't see how I, as the end customer, was supposed to have had any idea that this loader was going to weigh so much. Like I said, that is the main problem I have with this loader. I didn't buy this loader because it was rated to lift more than the 7308, I bought it because it was $1000 less and could still lift at least as much.

The other problem is the way the mounting kit gets in the way of servicing the engine. I went to a lot of trouble to try to research the M246 before I bought one. I called both Bush Hog and Great Bend (since the Bush Hog M246 is the same thing as the Great Bend 2130). I asked for pictures and asked about how the loader installed on the tractor. No one said anything about all the extra brackets and weight. No one could produce a picture of one on a Class II Boomer.

I found out about the farm show in Louisville, KY and at first Great Bend said they were going to have a TC29D there with a 2130 loader mounted on it, but they ended up not having it there. But, Bush Hog had a Kubota L3130 with a M246, so I went to the show to see it. The L3130 did not have the brackets running along side the engine compartment. There might have been some down lower that I didn't notice because they were black and the tractor frame is black. If they were there, they were completely out of the way. But, I did ask the guy at the show if there would be anything along side the engine on the TC29D and he said "No". I have found out since that the L3130 is a significantly bigger tractor, so the frame doesn't have to be beefed up as much. The L3130 weighs 800 lbs more and is 18" longer than a TC29D.

I also went to the Great Bend area at the show and talked to a guy there. He had a loader on a much bigger tractor, so I knew it didn't compare to the M246/2130. So, I asked him the same question, "if there would be anything along side the engine on the TC29D" and he said "No, it's a mid mount loader". When I left the show, I felt confident that the M246/2130 would be just right for my TC29D. I spent over a half a Saturday and it took me over 3 hours to drive the 70 miles back in the freezing rain, but I felt it was worth it to have actually seen a M246. Unfortunately, it was a waste of time.

If Great Bend would have had the TC29D there after all, I could have saved myself a lot of grief. Now, I'm being told (by Scott, the Bush Hog engineer) that the Class II Boomers are the #2 application of the M246. So, I don't understand why they didn't have one at the show or no one could produce any pictures when I asked for them over 2 months ago.

I don't appreciate the way Bush Hog is handling this. The fact that the end customer is not satisfied means nothing to you. All you can do is keep quoting "Bush Hog does not have a return policy". It's not my fault that this loader has been misrepresented. You should not be dumping the responsibility on the dealer where I bought the loader. It's not like I went out and bought some unknown brand, I went with Bush Hog because I know they've been around a long time a I felt that I could trust them. I'm not placing the entire blame on Bush Hog. I'm frustrated with my dealer for selling a product that he really didn't know much about. I get up in the morning and kick myself all day for not being more patient and waiting until I could actually see a M246 on a TC29D.

End Quote

At this point Jimmy interrupted and said he did not intend to do nothing. He wanted his local sales rep, Bill, to get with me and the New Holland dealer, John, and take a look at the FEL at my house and talk about what can be done. He said that Bush Hog is willing to help, but needs to have that meeting take place first. He said he would prefer that the loader not get sent all the way back to Bush Hog and wants to work something out with the dealer. I said OK, but I also told him that I don't want to solve the balance/safety problem by just adding weight to the rear end of the tractor, which is what John keeps saying is the solution.

I talked to John and the meeting with him and Bill is set up for Wednesday, the 14th.
 
   / When is rear ballast needed with a FEL?
  • Thread Starter
#67  
I had the meeting with my dealer, John, and the Bush Hog sales rep, Bill, this afternoon. I pointed out all of the things (above) that I told Jimmy last week.

Bill would not acknowledge the there was anything wrong at all and was not willing to do anything, period end of story. He said the weight of the loader is acceptable and all I have to do is add enough weight on the back to balance it. He said they make the loader to fit lots of different tractors and that was why they had to build the mounting kit the way they did. The brackets getting in the way of engine maintenance was a non-issue. He insisted I just need to add weight and then I’ll be happy.

John basically agreed with him and said adding weight to the rear will solve the problem. He said the weight difference between the 7308 and the M246 is negligible. He said it is not returnable and now it's a used loader and worth about half of what it cost new. All he said was that he would buy it back, but by the time he figured in the labor to take it off, it would cost me about $2300, so I’d basically be getting $1200 back. That is, I’d be out $2300 and not have anything to show for it. He did offer to give me a weight bar for the 3pt hitch and a few hundred pounds of weight, for free.

What would you do?
 
   / When is rear ballast needed with a FEL? #68  
</font><font color="blue" class="small">( What would you do? )</font>

I'd probably put some weight on the back end of the tractor.
 
   / When is rear ballast needed with a FEL? #69  
<font color="blue">What would you do?
</font>

I'd see if there was anyone here on tbn with a bigger tractor who might want to take it off your hands. I imagine you might have to throw in the cost to take it off your tractor & a mounting kit for their tractor if needed.

Plan B, sell the TC29 & get a TC40 /forums/images/graemlins/tongue.gif
 
   / When is rear ballast needed with a FEL? #70  
<font color="blue">…What would you do?...</font>

Danny, a couple schools of thought here…

If YOU determined… that’s the loader for me, I want that loader instead of the 7308 because it’s cheaper, I want the Bush Hog loader because it will pick up much much more than the NH 7308… If YOU talked YOURSELF into that loader, and not anyone else… then you have a big problem, only some fancy footwork and smooth talking may get you out… otherwise, unfortunately you may be stuck… /forums/images/graemlins/frown.gif

On the other hand, if THEY, meaning the dealer and/or the mfr. “shoved” this BH loader down your throat, and THEY made all these claims, and you have Proof of this… you may have one and a half legs to stand on for possible legal action… /forums/images/graemlins/frown.gif (you’d need to find other “dissatisfied BH 246/ NH29 owners)

Finally, as said before, no matter which loader you purchased, (NH or BH), ballast is a MUST when using a loader, not only from a safety standpoint, but for stability and proper loader operation…

For a test, put a minimum of a 800 – 1000 lb. load on the three point hitch and try that loader moving dirt… grab a heaping bucket full, keep the bucket dragging low near the ground for safety sake and test for stability…

From your many pictures, it appears the BH loader is designed for a larger tractor, the geometry is too large for the TC29 (versus the BH 146 or NH 7308), and because of that, you have to “over compensate” with “extra” rear ballast to correct the “misgivings” of the Bush Hog 246 loader and NH 29 “mismatch”…
 
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2006 Magnolia Dry Fertilizer Tender Trailer - Dual Stainless Compartments, Hydraulic Doors (A52128)
2006 Magnolia Dry...
2017 Claas Jaguar 860 Forage Harvester (A52128)
2017 Claas Jaguar...
2015 Ford Explorer AWD SUV (A50324)
2015 Ford Explorer...
2004 Sterling L8500 4,000 Gallon T/A Water Truck (A50323)
2004 Sterling...
2019 PETERBILT 579 SLEEPER (A51222)
2019 PETERBILT 579...
2013 Toyota Prius Hatchback (A50324)
2013 Toyota Prius...
 
Top