Speedy
Fordman
No need to get nasty, I have not and will not be rude to anyone. All are offering their opinions, and my opionions are just that, mine! And for the record, it's not the turbos I question, it's the internals. They (American car makers) have to prove themselves to me. Remember the GM 3.8 Turbo??? Remember the Corvair Turbo??
Yea those date back a ways but their track records are not sweet. Also kinda like the GM gasser/diesel conversions. When I see the Ford Ecoboost folks still very happy after 200K with a lot of towing miles in there I will sing a different tune.
Hey, I bought one of the first GM Front wheel drive (not counting the old Olds Toranado's) v6, fuel injected cars they put out, it was a Pontiac 2000. That thing was frought with problems. Ever have a rack and pinion system break from normal street driving? That one did along with a host of other problems. I am not new to driving, nor have I only owned one type or brand of car. Been driving legally since I was 15. That's 45 years on the road, and with a father that was a carreer mechanic, and myself a trained mechanic, I can honestly say I think I have a clue about the technology, and about companies putting crap on the market, to let US test it.
I am HIGHLY impressed with what Ford did with the Ecoboost truck engine, but just like folks say about drivers upping their mileage numbers, Ford (or any other car maker) is not in the market for ANY other reason, than to sell.
Sorry if I sounded nasty, as that is not what I intended, and for that, I apologize. I have seen so many naysayers (not just with the EcoBoost, but advancements in technology in general) that is gets old. I understand the "show me" attitude (hey, I'm from the "Show Me State"), but so many folks say "show me", and when they see one example to the contrary (say, just picking numbers here, 1 EcoBoost failed after 250,000 were perfect), they say the entire thing is a failure. The "show me" turns into "if it isn't 100% perfect, then it isn't good enough for me." I'm not saying you are that way, I've just seen it a lot.
Yes, manufacturers are in it to sell, that's how they make money. But today, the competition is so stiff, and the backlash due to a massive failure is so horrendous, that the reward is just not there to risk putting out an inferior product. Imagine that gasser to diesel conversion of GM if it were today. What kind of results would that have when everyone expects nearly perfect products. It would be a disaster. And I've been following Ford long enough that I have faith in there products, especially the newest tech in the last 3+ years.
Again, I apologize if I came across as nasty, it was more-or-less a smart-***** remark directed at all the negative nancies, not specifically you.
Best of luck on your truck search. With the weight you are towing, I, personally, would vote to go the gasser route. You could buy a nicer truck for less money. Don't let the fuel economy sway you toward a diesel unless you are towing 10's of thousands of miles per year. With diesel costing 10-30% more than gasoline, you need to get 10-30% better fuel economy just to break even on gas. When the time comes to buy a new truck, I'm hoping that Ford has an EcoBoost V8 available in a Super Duty. I love the way my diesel tows, but for my type of driving and the amount of towing I do, it's just not worth the drawbacks of a diesel if I can get similar power and torque numbers out of a gasser.