mo1
Platinum Member
2.55:1 is taller than 4.10:1, but yes, a larger-diameter tire yields more distance traveled per revolution, just like taller (numerically lower) gears.
Why is Weight The Only Solution Being Offered To The Problem Of Traction?
- Thread starter Cahaba Valley Farm
- Start date
- Views: 24207
2.55:1 is taller than 4.10:1, but yes, a larger-diameter tire yields more distance traveled per revolution, just like taller (numerically lower) gears.
OP
Cahaba Valley Farm
Veteran Member
Interesting
makes sense.
airbiscuit
Super Member
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2004
- Messages
- 6,522
- Location
- NW Wisconsin
- Tractor
- New Holland T2310 (40hp), Kubota L3010 GST, New Holland TC21DA *** Previously - Farmall H, 1941 John Deere B, Shibaura SD1500, John Deere 850, Bobcat 642, New Holland 1925
As I think about it, I think it has more to do with tangents and vectors. With a taller tire, more of the force is close to parallel with the ground.
airbiscuit
Super Member
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2004
- Messages
- 6,522
- Location
- NW Wisconsin
- Tractor
- New Holland T2310 (40hp), Kubota L3010 GST, New Holland TC21DA *** Previously - Farmall H, 1941 John Deere B, Shibaura SD1500, John Deere 850, Bobcat 642, New Holland 1925
airbiscuit
Super Member
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2004
- Messages
- 6,522
- Location
- NW Wisconsin
- Tractor
- New Holland T2310 (40hp), Kubota L3010 GST, New Holland TC21DA *** Previously - Farmall H, 1941 John Deere B, Shibaura SD1500, John Deere 850, Bobcat 642, New Holland 1925
If it was just about footprint, you could put duals or triples on the BX and it should do as well as the L2401?
LD1
Epic Contributor
Taller tires have a longer contact patch with the ground. And in softer conditions.....they arent trying to constantly climb up out of their own hole so to speak.
LD1
Epic Contributor
Its about both.
IF you put equal size tires on them, and they weighed the same, the traction would be the same. Then it would come down to gearing. Provided they both had the power to spin the tires, the tug of war would be a stalemate.
airbiscuit
Super Member
- Joined
- Aug 28, 2004
- Messages
- 6,522
- Location
- NW Wisconsin
- Tractor
- New Holland T2310 (40hp), Kubota L3010 GST, New Holland TC21DA *** Previously - Farmall H, 1941 John Deere B, Shibaura SD1500, John Deere 850, Bobcat 642, New Holland 1925
On asphalt maybe. In dirt, I'd bet on the taller tires. If you took that example to the extreme, you could have tires about 4" tall and 6' wide. I'd still bet on the taller tires.
BnRidge
Gold Member
A while ago my cousin talked about helping on the farm in the ealrly1960s. He recalled plowing with my dads JD720 diesel pulling a 4-14. "Must have had quite the jugs on it because it was keeping right up with the neighbors internationals." One of my earliest memories was dad filling those tires with water and glycol - more weight. I would agree, larger tire diameter would definitely help in soft conditions. But then its not so much about just friction alone, but adds that "climbing out a hole" part. Actually, there are recomendations for "optimal slip" when pulling high draft implements, somewhere around 10%. Weight, tires, draft, and just enough slip to not wear the drivetrain, yet get the work done.
Last edited:
OP
Cahaba Valley Farm
Veteran Member
Correct me if I'm wrong but the taller tire can cover more distance in a shorter amount of time then the shorter tire.
