Why SSQA?

   / Why SSQA? #1  

Musdalen

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2017
Messages
306
Location
STORY CITY, IA
Tractor
Ford 8N
On another thread, I asked "I'm about to buy a new tractor - about 39 horses. Why would I really want SSQA adapter for it if all I plan on using on the front end is the bucket or forks?"

To which someone replied, "That's really a topic for another thread. Changing between a bucket and forks without SSQA is going to be a real PITA."

If you go to the 9:05 mark in this video, it shows someone switching from bucket to forks faster than I can type this. I'm wondering that the advantage of SSQA is and whether i need it. I don't need anything faster than what is shown here:
 
   / Why SSQA? #2  
On another thread, I asked "I'm about to buy a new tractor - about 39 horses. Why would I really want SSQA adapter for it if all I plan on using on the front end is the bucket or forks?"

To which someone replied, "That's really a topic for another thread. Changing between a bucket and forks without SSQA is going to be a real PITA."

If you go to the 9:05 mark in this video, it shows someone switching from bucket to forks faster than I can type this. I'm wondering that the advantage of SSQA is and whether i need it. I don't need anything faster than what is shown here:

The video shows a quick connect setup - that is Deere proprietary, not the more universal SSQA. Very similar in function, and speed, but you'll be a bit more limited in implement selection since you'll only be able to get Deere style implements. If you'll be purchasing brand new, and never sharing, it likely won't be an issue.

No quick connect at all would require removing 4 pins (two pivot pins, two cylinder pins), and reinstalling those 4 pins every time you change attachments. Very time consuming, and messy due to all the grease. That's not what is shown in the video.
 
   / Why SSQA? #3  
JD does have a nice q/a, but it requires JD attachments. SSQA attachments are everywhere (used) and gives you the ability to "shop around" for both selection & price. If you ever sell or trade up I'm pretty sure you'd get your money back, and you may not think you will ever want other attachments now, but you will, trust me.:thumbsup:
 
   / Why SSQA? #4  
The video demonstrated John Deere's proprietary method of changing front implements. This is JD only. It is not a universal standard across all brands like SSQA is. There is nothing wrong with this proprietary hitch, but just be aware if you ever leave the JD marketplace you will need all new front implements as they will only fit JD tractors. It is a way of "locking you in" to JD. They didn't bother to show you how to lock those front implements in though with a couple of pins. :)

No big deal as it isn't much slower than throwing one or two SSQA levers. I mention it just so that you are aware there is another step.

NOW back to the question you really asked. The other posters were referring and comparing SSQA to the default alternative in other brands of a pin on bucket or heaven forbid pin on attachments. Now some people have the patience and time and the swearword vocabulary to get along with pin on, but I sure dont. And most others don't either. Pin on is an embuggerance. There is not another good way to describe it.

So to sum up, if you are buying a JD you can and will be happy with the proprietary JD system of front quick attach. If you are buying another brand you will want SSQA unless you just like to curse..:laughing:
 
   / Why SSQA? #5  
Generally that is called "JDQA" for John Deere Quick Attach. Its lighter than a SSQA setup, and although it is technically "proprietary" there are plenty well respected companies (like Artillian, WR Long and Everything Attachments) that make things that fit it-so it does not require "JD Attachments" as stated above.
The issue with most SSQA things you'll find used is that they are made for skid steer use and often way to heavy to effectively use on a compact tractor.
 
   / Why SSQA?
  • Thread Starter
#6  
embuggerance - I love it!

I don't see going further on the front end than the forks and the bucket. I've spend 16 yrs with an 8n and no FEL at all. I think I'm good with the fork and bucket arrangement. I'm going to gamble on it anyway.

Thanks.

Now to resolve loaded tires or chains, and the tire position questions. With those, I should have it all figured - I think.
 
   / Why SSQA? #8  
My only thought would be along the lines of personal experience, with a SSQA snow plow, which makes all the difference to me. That, and perhaps a grapple, or forks. Wouldn't want to be locked in to the Deere system. Pin on- uggg.
 
   / Why SSQA? #9  
The other noteworthy disadvantage to the Deere couplers is they aren't even compatible across Deere loader models.

SSQA is only "too large" for subcompacts IMHO. It is the most common, most utilized and has the most variety of attachments, period. No way that anyone choosing SSQA for a CUT or utility tractor is making a mistake.
 
   / Why SSQA? #10  
The other noteworthy disadvantage to the Deere couplers is they aren't even compatible across Deere loader models.
The 1, 2, 3, and 4 series machines share the same JDQA, only when you get into the 5 series the lower pins are about 4" lower.

ImageUploadedByTapatalk1406411184.466229.jpg
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2015 Dodge Charger Sedan (A46684)
2015 Dodge Charger...
2126 (A46502)
2126 (A46502)
2011 Ford F-250 Crew Cab Pickup Truck (A46684)
2011 Ford F-250...
Strobel 9.5yd. Pull Type Scraper - LOCATED NEAR REYNOLDS, IL (A49339)
Strobel 9.5yd...
2047 (A49339)
2047 (A49339)
New Long Forks (A48289)
New Long Forks...
 
Top