An interesting parallel: In pre-computer days my '81 Escort seemed to lock up as a 1-2 shift and remain there thru' the other gears. At the time, GM's THM 350-C would only lock up in the highest gear. (completely different case, valve body(s), etc than THM-350) Different shift strategies between brands back then. A computer could lock a TC at will, but require road speed input
not to do so when stopped.
An occasional problem with '80s GM FWD compacts (Cavalier, Grand-Am, etc) as they aged was stalling when coming to a stop

when the TC
wouldn't unlock. Simple fix was to unplug the TC switch externally. No lockup, no stall, and lead-footed student drivers wouldn't notice reduced gas mileage. (getting them to class is part of getting them out of the house

)
Not every one realizes that automatic transmissions were the first 'computers' in cars, and came along before WWII. Shift selectors traditionally limited the highest gear the trans would shift to. Computer, you say?

Yes, but hydraulic vs electronic. Governor provided road speed input, 'detent' linked to throttle was T-position input, and vacuum modulator was load input (more load = less vacuum). Valve body was the CPU that refined shift points accordingly.
Modern transmissions (their computers) read road speed digitally, get 'load' info from MAP sensor, and T-position by that little goodie that can act up independently of a computer monitoring its circuit loop. Biggest diff in modern stuff is servos hung on valve bodies vs them doing their own work stand-alone. Some early 'tow-haul' controls just raised shift points to account for slippage at lower rpm under load and reduce TC-generated heat. If the rest of this post doesn't mean much to the OP or others, I'll stick to wanting him to get the revs up & let the computer do the locking ...