Creamer
Elite Member
Now lets look at the map of donor states vs recipient states - The red state ripoff:
![]()
... And I found a quote on that page that speaks directly to your blue/red comparison:
"In essence those in blue states are subsidizing those in red states. Both red and blue states appear to be acting politically in opposition to their economic interests. Blue states are voting for candidates who are likely to continue the policies of red state subsidization while red states are voting for candidates who profess a desire to reduce federal spending (and presumably red state subsidization)."
It all depends on how you count. It looks like they are including the funds to care for all the federally owned land in all those red states that the state does not get tax money from. That is 1) a big loss to state coffers and two federal money that goes to federal uses and should not be counted. States like Utah are 40% federal lands. It is not a small chunk.