Bird
Rest in Peace
Too bad Isuzu does not still make their little truck with a diesel. I would guess it could handle the payload and sure got good mileage.
Yep, a friend of mine had the Isuzu diesel pickup and my dad had the Chevy Luv diesel (same thing). Fine economical little trucks.
my '95 dakota 4x4 3.9L V6 extended cab that would get 20 mpg on the freeway, but 12 mpg on my daily commute. Replaced the truck with a '99 GMC Sierra 5.3L V8 full size 4x4 extended cab and got 17 on the freeway with 16 mpg on the same daily commute.
Yep, gearing, weight, driving habits, traffic condtions, type of terrain, whether the engine is straining, even aerodynamics make a difference. I guess everyone knows the EPA came up with new/different criteria for their mileage estimates in 2006 and started using the new method in 2008.
My 2001 Ford Ranger with a 4.0L V-6 was rated in 2001 as 18 mpg city, 22 mpg highway, and 19 mpg combined. The new method would be 16 mpg city, 20 mpg highway, and 18 combined. Most of my driving is city, stop and go, pretty heavy traffic and my actual mileage has averaged 18.451 mpg.
My 2002 Ford Crown Victoria with a 4.6L V-8 was rated in 2002 as 17 mpg city, 25 mpg highway, and 20 mpg combined. The new method would be 15 mpg city, 23 mpg highway, and 18 combined. Most of my driving is city, stop and go, pretty heavy traffic, although last summer we made a 2,400 mile round trip to West Virginia, and my actual mileage has averaged 21.665 mpg. On the trip to WV, it got over 26 mpg running the speed limit to 5 over.
The EPA ratings are useful for comparing vehicles, but your actual mileage may vary considerably.