If that's the case all the other manufactures are lagging well behind Case/New Holland
First thing to compare would be the brakes. As many here already know, on a HST tractor the brakes seldom get used. This is not the case with the CTV.
The way the tranny itself worked was very odd too. It's a little hard to explain, but while pushing on the gas the engine would rev but it would act as if the tranny wasn't in tune. Kind if reminded me of cruise control where there is a flat spot until it hits the "set speed" And no it was not set to cruise! No matter what gear or what speed you chose the tractor would do this. Very difficult to drive.
To make sure it wasn't the one tractor (Farmall 50). I went to another dealership 40 miles away and drove a slightly used Bommer 3045, guess what? Same exact thing.I realize there are many configurations that these can be set up at but I was under the impression that this was as good as it got.
Only advice is to drive one yourself. Some on here seem to be happy with theirs and that's great. I think I'll stay with the HST thank you very much.![]()
The brakes on the CVT don't get used at all in my application, because is stops within a few feet of letting of the pedal. I have 105 hours on my CVT and have probably only used the brakes 5 times. And that was when I was learning how to use it. Some of the members on this forum seem to be against the CVT unit, that's fine because most people don't like change. Everybody that coments on the new technology does't have seat time on both units. Since 2003 I have had 3 new hydro units and now this CVT unit, all I can say is give it some time cus it will grow on ya.