That's pretty neat!
Hopefully the OP will clarify his question soon.
Some very good post. Before putting in any energy system; PV, wood burning stove, wind, solar water, geo thermal, etc. you should first look at your energy needs. Insulation in the house, inefficient appliances, etc. are almost always cheaper to tackle.
Very good points also have been mentioned on people spending tons of money on items that are not necessities without being ridiculed like someone looking into an alternative energy. Rob-D, nice points.
For me, I've looked at solar, wind, geothermal, solar hot water over the last 8-9 years. Solar PV finally makes sense for us. The price has dropped, rebates & credits have increased, and now NY allows leasing. I'd suggest anyone in NY to look at solar. The leasing is right for us, I'm told the numbers don't work out for everyone. We are spending just a few thousand to have all of our electricity needs paid for for AT LEAST 20 years. We will conservatively save over 10K and more likely closer to 20K.
I've been told that off-grid still doesn't make sense financially. The batteries are pretty expensive, and some of the rebates only apply to grid connected systems.
I'm going with an off-grid system on my ranch because I have to (no power for miles), and because I want to be ready for total self-sustained living.
Yes, solar panels have come way down in price and are a lot more efficient, but it is still expensive.
Personally, I think you get more people interested by showing what you can do, and encouraging them to take little steps, not by telling them how ignorant they are.
Your co-op thing sounds like a sweet deal, but for most of us, the payback period is huge, and on the average, the average Joe cannot produce electricity for anything close to what the grid can. I am 100% for alternative energy, and I'm doing what I can, but you might back off the in-your-face attitude if you are really interested in getting others to participate.
My 2 cents
with my 0.11/kwh electric, $6 would buy me ~55000 watts of electricity. "assuming" 100% efficcency and "assuming" 12 hours of charge/day, it would take 4646 days to pay back. Thats 12.7 years:confused2: And thats also assuming the pannels dont start to degrade or need replaced before then.
Thats why it just dont make sense to me. The payback needs to be 5 years or less for me to really consider it.
But heck, if my electric company ever comes up to me and says "hey, well install this system free of charge for you, AND never bill you again" of course I'd say yes.
Rod-D: Not everyone has the ability to get a free intertie system. In fact, I have never heard that until now.
If my electric company offered it, I'd have it in a heartbeat. After all, its free right:thumbsup: But that 6.4k intertie that you got free would cost most of us 50-60k+. And THAT just doesnt justify due to long cost of payback.
I have looked at solar SEVERAL times, and ALWAYS come to the same conclusion as grsthegreat and dmccarty, payback times are TOO long.
In their example of $6/watt installed:
with my 0.11/kwh electric, $6 would buy me ~55000 watts of electricity. "assuming" 100% efficcency and "assuming" 12 hours of charge/day, it would take 4646 days to pay back. Thats 12.7 years:confused2: And thats also assuming the pannels dont start to degrade or need replaced before then.
Thats why it just dont make sense to me. The payback needs to be 5 years or less for me to really consider it.
But heck, if my electric company ever comes up to me and says "hey, well install this system free of charge for you, AND never bill you again" of course I'd say yes.