Scooby074
Super Member
Some action vids. Apologies, they are not very good. Bouncing all over the place. Near the end of the first one and the entire second one is better. Have your Gravol handy.
Yeah....that's a pretty rough looking piece of wood there. How did the splitter react to those big knotty parts? That's about what all my wood around here looks like. Even the straight sections of the log are knotty as all get out. My little splitter has a hard time with them and some times I have to beat a clunker out and reposition it several times before It softens up enough to bust open. When I do my processor I want to make sure it has enough splitting power to power on through those knots without having to mess with having to dig them out and take another wack at it.
Most all the video you see of these machines in action shows them splitting nice clean straight grained wood. I was just wondering how it worked out in the real world. What kind of wood is that you have there? It looks a little like maple but the way the bark on some of the pieces look it looks like it could be white oak. I guess I need to eat more carrots my old eyes aren't what they used to be.
You guys are scarring me, I'm planning to use a 4" cylinder at about 2750 psi and I'm hoping to use a 6 way "Euro" style splitting head. I thought about a 5" cylinder but stuck with a 4" because I want the extra speed. I guess a new cylinder could be in my future.
I didnt realize that a knife wedge was considered Euro. I have never been to Europe, and have been building knife edges since way before the internet. As for the tonnage, I think you are on the right path with your suggestions. I use a 6way "Euro" style wedge. I have a 5in bore cyl. It will pretty much split anything I throw at it and I regularly split 30in dia rounds, Oaks, reds and white, Hickory, I think being the tuffest stuff. There are occasions that I bog the splitter on big forked or knotty junk. I have only stuck a round on the wedge once. A 5in bore cyl @2500psi is around 25 tons, @3000psi around 29tons. My actual pressure is probably somewhere in the middle of the pressures listed. For multiple splits I think a true 25tons is about as low as I would want to go. Of course if your splitting birch, aspen and such, I am sure you can get by with less.
You might be ok... but 17 ton isnt a lot of push, particularly with a multi wedge. If your wood is straight grained and small you would be OK, but who has that consistently?
The Hakki Pilke 1x42 only has 13t of push, and can use a multi wedge, but it maxes out at 16".
I think Id still go with a larger cylinder to get the tonnage up especially with the wood we typically see over here. Its not all straight grained white paper birch. I know in my experience so far I wish I had a larger cylinder. And a larger pump.
You bought it at PA right? They'll swap out what you got no problems.
Ken, are you planning on a build? You aren't far from me and I'd like to check it out once you get going if you don't mind
Just did some figuring for an average cycle time for a 5" vs 4" cylinder.
5" 53,014 lbs push
24" @ 6.5 inch/s = 3.69 s. - Cylinder return
10" @ 1.4 inch/s = 7.14 s - First 10" into the round
14" @ 5.5 inch/s = 2.55 s - High pressure kicks in
5" cycle time = 13.38 s
4" Cylinder 33,929 lbs push
24" @ 11.4 inch/s = 2.14 s
10" @ 2.1 inch/s = 4.72 s
14" @ 8.6 inch/s = 1.63 s
4" cycle time = 6.35 s.
Less time spent with a sledge hammer knocking stuck rounds out... priceless.
That's a big hit for the cycle time, more than double. To me, to have a productive processor, it all comes down to the splitter's speed. I've still got to give this some thought...
http://www.tractorbynet.com/forums/build-yourself/324028-firewood-processor-build-thread.html
Where abouts are you in Ottawa?
Less time spent with a sledge hammer knocking stuck rounds out... priceless.
Your figures are just estimate times really. Theory only works in the perfect world. If you are going to do multiple splits with your 4in cylinder, you can expect the pump to stay in the low flow/hp mode than it does in the high flow low pressure mode. This will increase your times considerably. Where as the 5in cyl will shift to high flow low pressure much more faster. My splitter has a 5in cyl and a 28gpm 2stage pump, cycle times around 12sec in large dia, 6way splits, I can make five folks tongues hang out splitting with it. Working by myself, i can split a 6x10 trailer load in about 20 min, and not break a sweat. Before the 6way wedge and 5in cylinder, I had a 4in cyl and 4way wedge and i could fill the trailer in about 20min working by myself, not breaking a sweat. Yep the 4way cylinder was faster than the 5in one, but splitting 6ways instead of 4 made up the difference. Just to throw more theory at you, My processor build should be able to do 12way splits, with twin 4 1/2 cylinders and 50 tons. Dia capacity of rounds is 27inches. Cycle times of 6sec. with 30in stroke and 60gpm. Theory says if i split max capacity of 27"x30" rounds, I should be able to split a cord every 3 min. Of course that means I have to saw a round every 6 sec also, and with a 29hp hydraulic chainsaw, it could be possible, but I aint hanging my hat on doing so.
If your serious about doing 6way splits, go with the 5in cyl. You will have fewer hang ups, and split times will still be faster than you can saw it.
Oh and recheck your math, 4cyl cycle time =8.49 not 6.35
4in @900psi=11,300lbs force 5 1/2tons in high flow mode 5in @900psi=17671lbs force 8 3/4tons in high flow mode
18 out of 20 times I can rock a stuck round off the (4 way) wedge, sometimes I put a small round (<4) sideways against the ram and the stuck round and slowly "roll" the stuck round up and off the wedge. for really tough situations, I keep a 4' piece of chain with a chain hook on one end near my splitter. Wrap the chain around the round and the the end of the ram and simply back off the ram slowly. This pulls the stuck round off the wedge every single time. The idea came to me one year when all the beating with a maul made absolutely no difference on a stuck apple stump I tried to split.