Since you have a FEL you may have little need to push backwards but if you want to clear your tracks with much of an angle on the blade you will want a foot+ wider than your rear tires. I am not sure clearing your tracks would be a huge issue unless you are clearing miles
You will find that going in reverse, with the blade reversed too, that it will really bite in and likely dig too much. If the ground isn't frozen, you'll be moving plenty of dirt too. In the paved portions of your drive, I'd worry about catching a crack or edge and really doing some damage.
Since you have a FEL you may have little need to push backwards but if you want to clear your tracks with much of an angle on the blade you will want a foot+ wider than your rear tires. I am not sure clearing your tracks would be a huge issue unless you are clearing miles
I am in the market for a rear blade. I plan to use it primarily for snow removal but probably also some grading work. I have read numerous threads (including the merits of front vs rear blade) but still am undecided about size and weight. I think I will be fine with a rear blade as we generally (forgetting about last winter) don't get much snow. I am thinking a seven footer would be best so it stays beyond the tires when angled. My second dilemma (recognizing this is not mutually exclusive from the size decision) is whether to go with a 都tandard duty vs. a 杜edium duty?e.g., Woods RB vs. HBL etc). The weight difference (and price difference) is significant and I am wondering what makes the most sense for my 3320. I plan on getting a blade that I can turn around to allow pushing of the snow - recognizing I need to be careful not to bend any of the three point assembly. My driveway is fairly long but paved. I am leaning toward the "standard duty" but...Thoughts?
Thank You - Dana