Jim Shooz
Veteran Member
So could Mr McLean now sue AZ for not providing adequate security to prevent someone coming in and robbing the place ?? Or is that a whole new can of worms
I can pretty much guarantee that had any one had a family member shot in the crossfire that could have occurred, they would have named AutoZone in their inevitable lawsuit.
Yes, it is too bad that Mr. McLean lost his job doing a good and noble deed. And he showed incredible restraint and good judgement in not firing his weapon. But I cannot find any fault with his employer covering its assets legally.
Yes, had someone been shot, there might have been a lawsuit, but the fact is that no one was shot. If Mr. McLean had followed company policy and his manager had been shot, would he have had a hard time living with himself knowing that he probably had the ability to prevent it? We can always play the "IF" game, but instead we need to make decisions on the facts, not the "IF".
Hard and fast rules and "zero tolerance" policies are seldom good anywhere, in my opinion. They start with the assumption that their employees are too stupid to use good judgment. Should we have zero tolerance in our laws? Suppose everyone caught doing one mph over the speed limit is fined? Everyone who is one day late with a house payment has his house foreclosed? But you can have zero tolerance without severe penalties. As jinman said, they could have suspended McLean for a short period of time for a lessor penalty. So . . . in my humble opinion, the person who fired McLean is the one who is stupid and should be fired.
Both James and Bird said it right.Yep:thumbsup:
Hard and fast rules and "zero tolerance" policies are seldom good anywhere, in my opinion. They start with the assumption that their employees are too stupid to use good judgment. Should we have zero tolerance in our laws? Suppose everyone caught doing one mph over the speed limit is fined? Everyone who is one day late with a house payment has his house foreclosed? But you can have zero tolerance without severe penalties. As jinman said, they could have suspended McLean for a short period of time for a lessor penalty. So . . . in my humble opinion, the person who fired McLean is the one who is stupid and should be fired.
Yes, had someone been shot, there might have been a lawsuit, but the fact is that no one was shot. If Mr. McLean had followed company policy and his manager had been shot, would he have had a hard time living with himself knowing that he probably had the ability to prevent it? We can always play the "IF" game, but instead we need to make decisions on the facts, not the "IF".
Couple more links on this story:
The sheriff is planning on giving Devin an award.
And for everyone who is going to boycott Autozone, here's a facebook page on it. This includes a way to donate, but I have no idea if its legit or not.
Keith