I think we can argue the should/shouldn't argument until we are blue in the face and not come to resolution. The known facts are that Mr. McLean got his weapon and the armed robber took off running. He brought the situation to a resolution in a very quick manner. That's what happened, right or wrong. Then, because of corporate policy, Autozone fired him. I think we are almost 100% unanimous in saying we disagree with this action. If they had given him a punitive week or two weeks off, I would not be happy with them, but not nearly as upset as I am for termination with no recourse. I hope somebody in the corporation with power has enough sense to overturn some HR automatron's knee-jerk reaction.