I never said YOU said it!
I was stating the facts. Manufactures can not deny or void a warranty due to the use of aftermarket products!
I know this for a fact as I BEAT FORD MOTOR COMPANY! When my F350 7.3 diesel broke a connecting rod at 28k. Ford told me they would not fix the motor under warranty because I had a K&N air filter on it. Said it was cost me 12k for a new motor. Didn't spend a dime and not only did I gent a brand new long block engine, I also got a loaner truck!.
I am not sticking up for anyone here I am just trying to educate everyone when it comes to aftermarket equipment on your tractors.
Just the fact that it was mentioned that the dealer should have told the customer or the customer should demand the dealer buy it back....This is a little far fetched...You need to let the right people know the issues and allow the time to have it rectified.
If anyone has any issue with what you can or can not put on you Kioti.
I would suggest you ask Kioti to send you a list of approved attachments. I would also tell you that if you have any non brand (of your equipment) to check their warranty policy.
I didn't say you said I said it.:confused2: I merely said I did not say it.... Phew!
Anyway, I agree with you, Wallace, that the OP ought to let the right people know, (Kioti selling dealer and Woods); AND allow the time to have the problem rectified. {Probably not fast enough for the OP, I'd guess, due to it being a new tractor/hoe with only 50 hours on it....}
And yes, it's absurd, (my word) to expect anyone to buy back anything at this early stage of seeking resolution.
I will say that it is yet still unclear what manufacturers can/can't do, or try to get away with regarding use of aftermarket items like a loader or hoe. It clearly states, and I believe you confirmed, that Kioti does not have to pay for the use of a non-Kioti brand hoe doing damage to a Kioti tractor. In this particular situation it seems the cause of the damage to the tractor needs to be determined. Then the responsible party, Woods, or the dealer, assuming faulty installation, for instance, will be able to be ascertained. Then, hopefully the OP will not be out any $, and he will have his tractor fixed and returned.
One sticking point remains, for me at least- say it is a faulty install of the hoe that caused the problem. Does the OP ask for a Kioti hoe so he does not chance further problems due to the Woods hoe being a greater risk to his tractor's future repairs, or does he stick with what he bought- even though he was not well informed by his selling dealer?!
So would you sell a customer, without informing them of the possible no- claim policy regarding non- Kioti attachments, or let them find out by reading it later, when nothing could be done? Or would you give them the skinny up front when buying a Bobcat? Not assuming anything here, just asking what a long term dealer like you does in these situations, or does to avoid this kind of possible outcome.
Thanks,
CM