BX2200 Vs B7500: The Age Old Question

   / BX2200 Vs B7500: The Age Old Question #11  
Okay, aparently I was misinformed about the back hoe unless this is a new item. By the way, it wasn't by the dealer and since this wasn't a mojor decision maker for me, I didn't verify it. Let me throw something else out there which also wasn't a major decision maker for me but kinda gave me pause. In the literature they made a big deal about the added hydro flow capacity in the B7500. Now, nothing I was going to get with the unit would be affected by this but it was another "future attachment" issue. I figured that some of the implements, especially those on which the hydro spun things and that required power...ie tiller, post hole digger....might make the work slower or more difficult. I think this ended up in my resale catagory like the back hoe and really were very low on my list.

Jeff

2001 B7500HSD, LA302 fel, 60"mmm, grass catcher
 
   / BX2200 Vs B7500: The Age Old Question #12  
The ditch in front of my home was the reason I went with the BX, actually. I tried a B7500 for a weekend, and when I went to try and mow the ditch, I started to lose it with the 7500. the BX handles it just fine, and I'm comfortable, no tippy feeling at all. The point is, you might want to try both on your property and decide. It might very well be that the BX is too small for you, but you have to weigh that against the inclines you want to handle. For me, if i ever need a backhoe, I'd prefer to rent an excavator and save the heavy wear and tear off my tractor anyway....

Just my humble opinion... They are both great machines designed for different uses...
 
   / BX2200 Vs B7500: The Age Old Question #14  
I think the original question was twofold:

1. How strong is the BX?

There are some minor differences in capacity for the front-end-loader and lift rating for the 3 point hitch - but in general I would say that the BX and the 7500 are of comparable strength. Both are well designed, robust tractors. I certainly wouldn't make a decision based on comparing the 'strength' of the two.

Now if you were to compare the BX with, say, the B2910 then I'd know that what you probably needed was a tractor with more beef to it.


2. Is the B7500 worth the extra $2-3k?

Good question. The only way to look at this from a purely rational perspective is to do a cost-benefit comparison.

I looked at the major tasks I would be using my tractor for and came up with mowing (majority), plowing snow, post-hole digging (planned fencing projects), landscaping (levelling, moving some dirt around), pulling various 'stuff' around, preparing the garden for tilling and some minor trenching. I also considered the fact that I have a bank along one part of my property that has a high pucker factor.

I then figured out how much each of these projects would cost to 'hire-out' or hire equipment in to do it. Based on the rates in my area I easily justified the BX purchase to my battle-hardened CFO.

All of the above are easily doable with the BX. The B7500 offered me no advantage - in fact there was a slight disadvantage when I thought of mowing the bank. In fact, the only reason I would have considered the B7500 is if my property was heavily wooded (for the extra clearance). Even then I could easily argue that with a bit of pushing and shoving and a little chainsaw work I could save myself a couple thousand. Even when mud is an issue you could cart in some stone and deal with the problem for a lot less than 2-3 thousand.

If I needed more tractor to do heavier tasks I would have skipped the B7500 and gone straight up to a 2410.

I'm not anti-7500 -- I just think that the BX stomped on a lot of its reason for existence -- especially considering the latest posts regarding the backhoe that seems to be coming soon. I guess I'm not one that worries about whether I'm sitting a few inches higher off the ground or not - because of my size I make the B7500 and the BX2200 both look like garden tractors anyway.

By the way - I noticed that the old chestnut of the BX not working with a post hole digger came up again ... here's my rebuttal.

BX and Post Hole Digger

BX 2200 w/Post Hole Digger

Digging post holes with my BX2200

Hope you find this useful!

Patrick
 
   / BX2200 Vs B7500: The Age Old Question #15  
Re: BX22 Vs B7500: The New Question?

I stand corrected. I've seen the BX abbreviated so much I thought it was.
 
   / BX2200 Vs B7500: The Age Old Question #16  
Re: BX22 Vs B7500: The New Question?

GlueGuy,

How long do you think it will take before the after-market companies make a backhoe for the BX though? Let's face it - if the BX22 is a success (which I expect based on the success of Kubota's other mini-excavators) then the after market companies won't be able to resist. They'll also be able to see exactly what the additional engineering is that is required to beef up the back-end of the BX to handle the additional loads.

I'd be interested to see the sales figures - but am betting that the BX has already sold more units than many other small tractors for which backhoes have been developed ...

Patrick
 
   / BX2200 Vs B7500: The Age Old Question #17  
I've been lurking(and chuckling)! I just had to comment on this picture. The guy looks like an elephant trying to ride an ant!! I think he would be happier with ANYTHING bigger. Ground clearance would scare me also that hoe attach ain't far off the ground!
 
   / BX2200 Vs B7500: The Age Old Question #18  
What they didn't tell you is the guy is 6' 10" and weight 290 pounds. /w3tcompact/icons/wink.gif

Perhaps the guy should just plop a saddle on the hood, put reins on the FEL and stirrups on the deck and ride off into the sunset. /w3tcompact/icons/smile.gif

Just havin' a little fun you <font color=orange>orange</font color=orange> guys, don't get upset.

tractor.gif
 
   / BX2200 Vs B7500: The Age Old Question #19  
Re: BX22 Vs B7500: The New Question?

Some off us have no need for a backhoe even if we had a bigger tractor. That a loader/ backhoe version of the BX will be available is great news for those who need such a unit--I think the standard version will continue to be available (educated guess).
As to Reds comment. I suspect we have been infiltrated by yet another disgruntled JD dealer who sees even more sales flying out the window. The angle the picture was taken and the fact he has his foot up to release the brake are why he looks so big. The BX is quite comfortable for people of normal size (5-6 to 6-2) give or take. Like I said once in the past, some of you guys might need a diet /w3tcompact/icons/laugh.gif before you could be comfortable on anything short of a D12 dozer .
Nope, not giving up my position as high priest! No way. J
 
   / BX2200 Vs B7500: The Age Old Question #20  
Re: BX22 Vs B7500: The New Question?

<font color=blue>Like I said once in the past, some of you guys might need a diet before you could be comfortable on anything short of a D12 dozer. </font color=blue>

Thanks for the laugh! /w3tcompact/icons/smile.gif

tractor.gif
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2003 Mack MR688S 58 Meter Putzmeister Concrete Pump Truck (A45336)
2003 Mack MR688S...
2016 Ford Explorer AWD SUV (A46684)
2016 Ford Explorer...
HarbinGer V3E 8kW Towable Light Tower (A45336)
HarbinGer V3E 8kW...
Oregon ML350 Hydraulic Lawn Mower Lift (A46502)
Oregon ML350...
2014 Volkswagen Passat Sedan (A42744)
2014 Volkswagen...
3078 (A46502)
3078 (A46502)
 
Top