zozomike
New member
Facts are aplenty, but facts will not convince the deniers, as they are driven by ideology, not the powers of observation that they almost all use every day. Tell me the difference in an operator studying a machine or field failure that is different from science? There is ideally little difference. Both are based in observation, in developing a hypothesis, and than doing the work to verify or disprove that hypothesis. But somehow people who believe they know their own work, have decided that "scientists do not know science". An odd rejection of experience.
I spent 20 years traveling the US adjusting weather catastrophe related building and equipment disasters. And in the last 10, (recently retired) I almost always met at least one old timer, often a farmer, who would say "I grew up here, been here 60-70 years, and we never before had weather like this, never this strong".
Will climate disaster have to happen to each and every one of us before the deniers begin to use the observation skills they already have on this problem?
By then, it will be too late.
I spent 20 years traveling the US adjusting weather catastrophe related building and equipment disasters. And in the last 10, (recently retired) I almost always met at least one old timer, often a farmer, who would say "I grew up here, been here 60-70 years, and we never before had weather like this, never this strong".
Will climate disaster have to happen to each and every one of us before the deniers begin to use the observation skills they already have on this problem?
By then, it will be too late.