J
JohnBarlow
Guest
The "Content-Type:" header (redundantly long) is present in the "archive" format, and specifies text/html.
The "X-Mailer:" header is different between them, and I assume this is the tool used to format and post the message based on postings to the list.
Perhaps Greg_g has the email client configured to display HTML message formats only, and that is why the "digest" format (which came through without HTML markup) showd nothing - there was no HTML format to the message ?
Of note, my tractorbynet subscription configuration specifies that I want my emails "in plain text", but obviously the "archive" format is being sent to me with some HTML. That it is sent with some HTML explains why it displays poorly for me, if the message is interpreted as HTML then each line requires a line break or end of paragraph marker, without that the carriage returns in the message are treated as white space.
Soo, if the current "archive" format truely was emailed out in plain text I would be very happy ?
Ta, John.
The "X-Mailer:" header is different between them, and I assume this is the tool used to format and post the message based on postings to the list.
Perhaps Greg_g has the email client configured to display HTML message formats only, and that is why the "digest" format (which came through without HTML markup) showd nothing - there was no HTML format to the message ?
Of note, my tractorbynet subscription configuration specifies that I want my emails "in plain text", but obviously the "archive" format is being sent to me with some HTML. That it is sent with some HTML explains why it displays poorly for me, if the message is interpreted as HTML then each line requires a line break or end of paragraph marker, without that the carriage returns in the message are treated as white space.
Soo, if the current "archive" format truely was emailed out in plain text I would be very happy ?
Ta, John.