Firewood processor project.

[Virx1]

Yes it is self built.
I used the pump, made an additional return hole on the lid so that the oil could go back more easily. When the oil is pushed in pressure side the pump starts to run as an engine.
I don't know how long the shaft seal is working, but it worked for me right now.
Pumbast mootori tegemine. - YouTube

 

[polemidis]

I can make blueprints, Freecad can produce technical drawings. I just didn't because its not that complicated machine it was easy to measure the distances right on the cad file. But of course, most of the steel is cut on my CNC, so I do not need drawings for that, It goes from the CAD, to the CAM to the CNC.

Millet you are 4hours away from me. You are welcome anytime to come and see my machine, and my customers machine (the winch feed type) I just received most of the hoses, so it may be fully functional in the next few weeks. We plan to push the machines to the limits for the test drives

 

[Millet]

Thanks for the invitation I never went to the US but who know, I might come with my CAD drawing

But speaking of tool, I plan to use some tool like an angle grinder, lincoln stick welder, drill press... what is the most useful tool that I might need?
A plasma cuter? a belt grinder?

 

[Virx1]

Today I welded the ax together.
Here are some pictures of how the project has gone.

 

[4570Man]

That plasma table would be nice. A little neater than my handheld torch. What does the beam and cylinder look like?

 

[muddstopper]

Hi thank you for your 2 cent, I appreciate!

I have explain my project a little bite, mostly the type of wood, the quantity I need to process per year, budget, the kind of processor
"inspire" me . Message # 28. But it's true I have not a plan of the design of the processor yet. I need to do some research still and
need some "2 cent" from people before to go to the drawing table. I will post some detailed plan when I have some.

For now, I think that the first "饕auche" of the processor will not have a saw cylinder, may be. I will operate the saw with an arm. I will may be install
a saw cylinder later and I will sketch my plan with this possibility.

I plan to use a gear motor for the saw. Thank you for the F11 but like you said is not necessary.

Maybe this one:

1.53 cu in Salami 2.5MB25R-R55S3 Hydraulic Motor | High Speed Hydraulic Motors | Hydraulic Motors | Hydraulics | www.surpluscenter.com

What do you think?

I plan to build a log infeed convoyer with a belt. I know it's more fragile but it's lighter and less complicated.

But I plan to built a log table like that:

View attachment 591789

With roller with teeth, and I like that it's build on a trailer.

The processor is transported with the tractor 3 point.

The pump is not an easy question. My plan is to use 2 pto pumps on the same shaft. because I can't find a tandem pump that is big enough.
Or is very expensive.

Surplus center don't have many pump with tandem option. they only have two pump option with a too small second pump.

Do you have a website that sell triple or double pump like you discribe?

I think that you can mount this kind of pump if you have a long shaft.

View attachment 591790

I didn't picture exactly what is your idea about the hydraulic circuit.

Like How can I have 3 actuator with one sequence valve?

View attachment 591791
Or maybe the valve of the motor saw have a "button" that, when the saw is lowering the motor start? like in this video at 1min 05sec:

Processeur a bois RR 2�T - YouTube

Sorry for not replying sooner. I wrote out a long post trying to explain a few things then lost it. I am not going to try and rewrite it. To answer about the sequence valve. A SV can have more than one spool that are activated according to the pressure setting of each spool. Each spool will operate as soon as the spool before it reaches a set pressure point. The SV is supplied oil from one main control valve.

To touch on the hyd motor you linked to. Nothing wrong with it,if you can supply enough oil to turn it fast enough to get the desired chains speed. It will take a lot of oil, but it would be a mean saw motor. You also mentioned a .7cuin motor. I would consider that a minimum size motor to use. I know of several folks that have chosen the motor, some like it and some have swapped it for a bigger motor. How well it works for you will depend on type and size of wood you want to cut and what you consider a decent cutting speed. My suggestion is to select a gas powered chains saw that you would like to replicate cutting speed, torque and hp and work back from there. It takes some math but you can match those gas saw numbers using hyd and selecting the correct parts. Compare chain speed, not engine rpms. The chain is whats doing the cutting. Also take into consideration that a chainsaw rated to turn 13000rpms will only pull about 9000rpms when deep in the cut. Also a chainsaw uses a small, usually 7pin sprocket to pull the chain. A hyd motor turning 4500rpms using a 14pin sprocket will give the same chains speed as the faster running gas saw.Take the chain pitch and multiply by 2. Multiply the above number by the number of teeth of the saw sprocket.Multiply that number by the saw R.P.M.The final answer will be the chain speed in inches per minute, just divide by 12 to convert to feet per minute. The feet per minute is the speed you are trying to match when compareing your hyd saw to your gas saw, not the rpms of the motors. Once you reach your chosen chain speed, dont be surprised if the hyd saw has better torque/hp numbers than the gas chainsaw. Unless you go with to small a hyd motor just to reach chainspeed.

 

[texasranger556]

Another consideration is horsepower. If for example you're trying to match the performance of a 6 horsepower gas chainsaw, the equation is HP = PSI * GPM / 1714. Say the pressure drop across your motor is 2000 PSI, you would need approx 5.2 GPM to generate 6 HP. Knowing that, pick a motor displacement and sprocket size that gives you the chain speed you want given it needs to flow at least 5.2 GPM.

These are hypothetical numbers. Pump and motor efficiency, line loss, etc all factor in...to what degree I have little experience so I would add some margin and tunability to the design to be safe.

 

[muddstopper]

Power (the rate of doing WORK) is dependent on torque and rpm.
Torque and rpm are the measured quantities of engine output.
Power is calculated from torque and RPM, by the following equation: HP = Torque x RPM ÷ 5252 Torque is the power, hp is the speed. The torque and hp curve will always cross at 5252 rpms. Torque is measured from the center of a rotational shaft. Increaseing the size of the rotation by increaseing sprocket size will reduce the effective torque being supplied. In other words, if you increase the sprocket size from 7pins to 14pins, you will reduce the available torque. The larger sprocket will increase the speed, but available hp will stay the same. Since you are trying to increase chainspeed by going to a larger sprocket, you would need to increase the psi being supplied to the hyd motor to maintain the torque numbers of the hyd motor as measured at the shaft. torque numbers of your hyd motor are usually given for a predetermined recommended psi and flow. The hyd motor will also have a rpm for a given flow. The rpms are a factor of motor size and flow. Since the size of the motor is usually given in cuin or cc for how much oil it takes to make one rotation, you can use the motor size to determine how much flow you need to reach a desired rpm. I havent comfirmed this, but I believe most of the processor manufacturers that are using gear motors for chainsaws, will overflow the recommended flow to achieve the desired speed for their saw motors. The motors they choose probably have upgraded seals and shaft bearings instead of bushings to handle the extra flow. thats just my opinion and I have not verified it. I did Talk with a engineer with Pocline and he assured me that their off the shelf axial piston motors could handle extra oil flow without anything detrimental happening to the hyd motor. Thats is up to a certain amount of course.

Now with all that rambling being said, bottom line is this. A given size hyd motor will produce a given amount of torque at a given amount of pressure. That hyd motor will turn at a given rpms using a given amount of flow. It is also a given that you can increase torque by increaseing pressure and increase rpms by increaseing flow.. The question is, will the hyd motor handle the extra pressure and flow before becoming unreliable. It is also a question of do you have the engine hp needed to pull a hyd pump that will produce the desired pressure and flows one wishes to reach.

 

[texasranger556]

Torque is the power, hp is the speed.

I understand what you're saying and generally agree, but torque is by definition a measure of force, horsepower is a measure of power (force * distance...in this case angular velocity/RPMs).

 

[muddstopper]

I understand what you're saying and generally agree, but torque is by definition a measure of force, horsepower is a measure of power (force * distance...in this case angular velocity/RPMs).

I think we are in agreement. What I was trying to point out that simply looking at published torque numbers can be misleading if you dont understand how changing out sprocket size on a shaft will effect the final torque numbers, (output), or actual torque needed to perform the intended operation. Torque of a engine is measured at the engine shaft and final output is effected by the final gearing. A sprocket is a form of gearing. With that said, if you choose a gas powered chainsaw to model your hyd saw after and you use the published numbers of the gas engine to determine your hyd motor size, you must allow for the sprocket size to choose your actual hyd motor to equal matching performance. And example would be a chainsaw that produces 10lbft of torque with the 7pin sprocket, to match the performance the hyd motor would need to produce 20lbft torque with the 14pin sprocket, that number being measured at the shaft.

You also have to consider the mechanic disadvantage of the gas engine versus the fluid advantage of the a hyd motor. As the gas saw is cutting, it is limited by the amount of air and gas the engine can combust and produce power. This is usually provided by the throttel of the saw and is usually at wot, maximum torque and hp, when starting the cut. As a result, the gas engine can only get slower as it is consuming power. On the other hand, the hyd motor is getting its power from a fluid drive that starts out at minimal power and pressure and as the load increases, the pressure increases. Limited only by the relief settings and the hyd pumps supplying the power, and of course the engine pulling the pump. The hyd saws torque can actually increase as the load is increased. When I say increase, minimal power is being produced to simply run the hyd saw, it is not until a load is applied and pressure increases, that the actual torque output of the hyd motor is realized.