BX tent guy
Member
If I knew where to get them I would do that.Sad to say I'd be ponying up to maintain the awesomeness. Do you have a supplier that you get 'em from?
Need to go in my "as-if" tractor bookmark folder....
If I knew where to get them I would do that.Sad to say I'd be ponying up to maintain the awesomeness. Do you have a supplier that you get 'em from?
Need to go in my "as-if" tractor bookmark folder....
Email returned. Thanks!
For the sake of the discussion, this is what I had in mind.
I am certainly not locked into this design, but it'd work. Maybe there is a less fitting intensive design. I've seen those air manifolds (http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51avnKHPgDL._SX342_.jpg) but it's a 3-up with a spot for a valve, not a 4-up. Plus I dunno about room for the other fitting half.
This is 3/8 fittings and nipples, probably just from Home Depot. 1" nipples appear to be plenty large and give room for the mating fittings.
View attachment 421084
View attachment 421085
I can't imagine having to buy the Mates to that Italian connector for each implement. Although it is cool looking.
]
My Kub. came with "Faster" brand fittings, they are a regular "ag" pattern available locally.
FWIW, I think that a lot of electricaly operated 3 function valves leak some past the sol.valve creating just enough pressure to make connection hard. It seems that a tablespoon or so of fluid that I see when using my little tool is all it takes to make it a not so quick connect :laughing:
aeblank, How did you make out with your Manifold idea?
I did what I mentioned in my post (post #9 I think) I made a pressure release with extra connectors. The problem isn't with the tractor it's with the implement. If you try to reconnect when the temperature is hotter than when you disconnected.... It builds pressure in the lines. It's a problem with the 'new' Flush Face connectors (ISO16028). They are environmentally friendly, just not User friendly.
So you have normal flat face QDs on your impliments & connect under pressure flat face QDs on the machine? I'm assuming they are compatible between the standard ones & the connect under pressure? Which ones you using?If you install connect under pressure fittings on your machine, you won't have to deal with each implement. I have them on my CTL and no longer have any problems with any of my 9 hydraulic attachments.
If you install connect under pressure fittings on your machine, you won't have to deal with each implement. I have them on my CTL and no longer have any problems with any of my 9 hydraulic attachments.
So you have normal flat face QDs on your impliments & connect under pressure flat face QDs on the machine? I'm assuming they are compatible between the standard ones & the connect under pressure? Which ones you using?
Ya, I agree with getting one side hooked up. I have a PHD & plow. So the hydraulic motor & pair of single acting cylinders leakdown, spin, contract, or otherwise equalize relieving the pressure on the other QD once you get the first hooked up.Exactly. Occasionally I'll find that hooking up the male connector from the implement works best. It's easier to push into the female on the machine and relieve any residual pressure in the attachment.

I made something very similar but used a 4-way cross tee instead of a Tee and just left it open on the sides. I stuff a paper towel in there. Sounds like you have the exact same issues I have and tried all the same things...