| Dimensions | |
| Wheelbase: | 63.3 inches 160 cm |
| Width: | 55.1 inches 139 cm |
| Height (ROPS): | 91.7 inches 232 cm |
| 2WD Ground clearance: | 13.6 inches 34 cm |
| 4WD Ground clearance: | 13.4 inches 34 cm |
| Front tread: | 41.3 inches 104 cm (2WD) |
| Front tread: | 43.1 inches 109 cm (4WD) |
| Rear tread: | 43.8/47.1/50.8 inches 111/119/129 cm |
| Engine Detail | |
| Kubota | |
| diesel | |
| 3-cylinder | |
| liquid-cooled | |
| Displacement: | 111.4 ci 1.8 L |
| Bore/Stroke: | 3.43x4.03 inches 87 x 102 mm |
| Emissions: | Tier IV |
| Power (gross): | 37.5 hp 28.0 kW |
| Fuel system: | common rail direct injection |
| Rated RPM: | 2700 |
| Starter: | electric |
| Starter volts: | 12 |
The 6.3 gpm on the Kubota seemed awful low so I checked. That is just for the main pump, there's another 3.8 for PS, so 10.1.
Have to agree, look at the weight first, then check for access to the dealerships as support is paramount especially with supply chain issues. They are not all the same and then I would dig into the quality and reliability as any tractor runs good the first 20 hrs, it's the next 2000 you need to worry about.
Dimensions Wheelbase: 63.3 inches
160 cmWidth: 55.1 inches
139 cmHeight (ROPS): 91.7 inches
232 cm2WD Ground clearance: 13.6 inches
34 cm4WD Ground clearance: 13.4 inches
34 cmFront tread: 41.3 inches
104 cm (2WD)Front tread: 43.1 inches
109 cm (4WD)Rear tread: 43.8/47.1/50.8 inches
111/119/129 cm
Engine Detail Kubota diesel 3-cylinder liquid-cooled Displacement: 111.4 ci
1.8 LBore/Stroke: 3.43x4.03 inches
87 x 102 mmEmissions: Tier IV Power (gross): 37.5 hp
28.0 kWFuel system: common rail direct injection Rated RPM: 2700 Starter: electric Starter volts: 12
The fundamental importance of TRACTOR WEIGHT eludes many tractor shoppers. Tractor capability is more closely correlated to tractor weight than any other single specification.
Bare tractor weight is a tractor specification easily found in sales brochures and web sites, readily comparable across tractor brands and tractor models, new and used.
Within subcompact and compact tractor categories, a significant tractor capability increase requires a bare tractor weight increase of 50%. It takes a 100% increase in bare tractor weight to elicit MY-OH-MY!
When considering a tractor purchase bare tractor weight first, tractor horsepower second, rear axle width third, rear wheel/tire ballast fourth.
I don’t understand what CUTS are. Are you saying this model Kubota couldn’t run a brush cutter well?Branson, LS and Kioti all make at least one model that competes. I found the L01 series to be pretty bare bones in terms of features. For example one feature I wanted was independent PTO so I would not have to get on the tractor to turn the PTO on and off like I did on my previous tractor. That's a pain when operating a PTO chipper or forestry winch.
Adding the regular and steering GPMs together is pretty much meaningless as they are never used together. It makes a bigger number though, that's why manufacturers do it. Most CUTS don't have enough hydraulic flow to do work like running a hydraulic mower or brush cutter or snow blower. That's skid steer territory of 20gpm and up. All CUTS really need is enough to run a loader or backhoe.
Compact Utility Tractors don't have the hydraulics to drive hydraulic implements well.I don’t understand what CUTS are. Are you saying this model Kubota couldn’t run a brush cutter well?
Gotcha. Still learningCompact Utility Tractors don't have the hydraulics to drive hydraulic implements well.
PTO driven cutters and other implements are fine.
You came to the right place, TBN is a great place to learn.Gotcha. Still learning
If you will be operating on hills, slopes or rough ground, particularly Loader work, you would be wise to consider (any brand) tractor platform an increment wider than the Kubota L3901 @ 55" for stability.Still learning
Adding the regular and steering GPMs together is pretty much meaningless as they are never used together. It makes a bigger number though, that's why manufacturers do it....
The spreadsheet evolved over a period of several weeks/months, before I even joined TBN. I started out comparing Kubota and JD. As I added more tractors to the list I started adding more details. I never really thought that I would be sharing the information so I didn't necessarily go back and fill in missing or incomplete data, especially as I narrowed down choices (like going to a larger frame and HP). Since I have shared this a few times and may again in the future I will make corrections to the Hydro capacities. There was no intent to deceive, just plugging in numbers as I found them on Tractor Data at the time.Of total flow, about 4 gpm is used for PS on tractors this size, the rest for everything else. The chart IndyJay posted shows Kioti's total gpm including PS, while only Kubota's w/o PS.
OP,
It also depends on what you want to do with it. Some folks don't really care about max FEL lift, as they'll never really pick up anything heavy. Some folks don't care about rated pto horse power, because they'll never hook up a pto driven attachment. Some folks want light weight because all they're doing is mowing their lawn. Some folks want heavy weight because they're using the FEL to lift as much weight as possible per lift. Some folks care about high horse power because they need to run a wood chipper, or a big 3 pt brush hog over dense fields of brush and grass. Some folks are so worried about "Tier-IV" tractors that they'll only look at 25hp models, regardless of how much horse power they actually need.
Some "stats" are more important to the individual than others.
So what's important to You? (aka, what are you going to do with this thing?)
I have considered it…
I have considered i