Pete 335

   / Pete 335 #11  
That would probably be cheaper than moving the axel. Plus the turn radius would be better.
 
   / Pete 335
  • Thread Starter
#12  
Adding frame and air lift axle gets me close to the cost of a tandem 6x6.
However, none of the 6x6s are Peterbilts and none have an 8.3L and all the features.
Most are IH with a DT466/530 or one of the junk MaxForce engines,or it’s a Freightliner with a C7. Former digger Derrick trucks. Very underpowered and usually beat to death
 
Last edited:
   / Pete 335 #13  
If you want to play you've got to pay. You are mixing wants and needs. When your wants become necessities the budget goes up. Putting a tag on a 4x4 would be about the last thing I would do. Just go to a marine salvage yard and get an old ship anchor, get most of the same results.
 
   / Pete 335
  • Thread Starter
#14  
If you want to play you've got to pay. You are mixing wants and needs. When your wants become necessities the budget goes up. Putting a tag on a 4x4 would be about the last thing I would do. Just go to a marine salvage yard and get an old ship anchor, get most of the same results.
Huh?
How is increasing payload a “ship anchor”?
It has more power than most tandems, so adding payload won’t make it slower than a factor tandem.

Its definitely a need. I had 3 trucks last year. Now I have 1.
Im at my wits end needing another truck
 
   / Pete 335 #15  
Huh?
How is increasing payload a “ship anchor”?
It has more power than most tandems, so adding payload won’t make it slower than a factor tandem.

Its definitely a need. I had 3 trucks last year. Now I have 1.
Im at my wits end needing another truck

Power isn’t the only consideration. Most tandems are geared better for the job. Could you just stick a 12’ bed on and call it good?
 
   / Pete 335 #16  
That what I was thinking. Can you live with a 12 or 14ft body instead? Seems like that would be the easiest and cheapest option, but you did say 16ft is an absolute need. Is that because the 6tons of hay in square bales needs that length?
 
   / Pete 335 #17  
Found a really sweet 2009 Pete 335 4WD with a Paccar PX8 (8.3L Cummins), Allison 3000 and air brakes. 33,000 GVWR. Has air to rear. 10/23 axles.
However, it only has 12’ of frame and 108” cab to axle. Makes a 16’ flatbed kinda tough. Ideally should be 120” cab to axle for 16’ flatbed.
I really like this truck, but sliding the axle back a door is pricey. Body installer says ”it‘ll be ok”, but as I told him, I want to pull a 10 ton hay trailer behind it and 6 ton hay on the bed (square bales).
Thoughts?
It does have decent specs and appears to be a nice looking truck. If you are intent on a 16' bed, you have two options. Stretch it or pass it by. Finding a good used medium/heavy duty single axle with FWD is challenging. I personally would not be interested stretching one with FWD. It can be done but at a cost. For me unless I had my heart set on a white Pete, I would keep looking unless the seller is willing to really deal on it to offset the cost of making it suit your needs. Good luck on it.
 
   / Pete 335 #18  
Huh?
How is increasing payload a “ship anchor”?
It has more power than most tandems, so adding payload won’t make it slower than a factor tandem.

Its definitely a need. I had 3 trucks last year. Now I have 1.
Im at my wits end needing another truck
Putting a tag on a 4x4 will be a huge negative when it comes to traction. Claiming an 8.3 has more power than most tandems is just plain silly.
You might need a truck but you don’t ‘need’ a Pete. There are other brands just as good.
 
   / Pete 335 #19  
Putting a tag on a 4x4 will be a huge negative when it comes to traction. Claiming an 8.3 has more power than most tandems is just plain silly.
You might need a truck but you don’t ‘need’ a Pete. There are other brands just as good.

You can lift the tag when you’re off road. If it’s sunk and still hitting the tag you’re probably stuck anyway. I’d like to see the specs on the 8.3 but I’m guessing it’s 250 hp 800 fp of torque. But it’s gears that get the job done and single axels are usually lacking on gears. I’d bet money on a tandem truck with lockers on the back and no power to the front beating this truck off road pulling the same 16 tons. 8 tires pulling beats 6 and that’s assuming the 6 wheeler has lockers on both ends which it probably doesn’t.
 
   / Pete 335
  • Thread Starter
#20  
Putting a tag on a 4x4 will be a huge negative when it comes to traction. Claiming an 8.3 has more power than most tandems is just plain silly.
You might need a truck but you don’t ‘need’ a Pete. There are other brands just as good.
Well, if you call 250Hp DT466s or CAT C7 at 275Hp more powerful than an 8.3L Cummins @ 300Hp “plain silly”, there not much left to discuss.
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2016 CATERPILLAR 239D SKID STEER (A51242)
2016 CATERPILLAR...
2018 GENIE GTH-5519 TELESCOPIC FORKLIFT (A51242)
2018 GENIE...
2013 Chevrolet Caprice (A50324)
2013 Chevrolet...
2018 PETERBILT 579 SLEEPER (A51222)
2018 PETERBILT 579...
2008 International CF500 Electric Lift Service Truck (A48081)
2008 International...
2013 LONE STAR TRAILER MFG. (A50854)
2013 LONE STAR...
 
Top