Were they really that bad or did Nader just find a way to create a name for himself?
Especially this one: https://www.youtube.com/@MattsOffRoadRecovery2nd generation Corvairs were cool looking (65-69). Pintos, not so much IMHO. A Corvair rear engine station wagon was quite a vehicle.
The tires were my first clue, didn't really notice the suspension until you mentioned it. Also, those straps don't seem to be tied to anything on the truck.Bottom of tires look flat. Suspension hanging as if the car is resting on its wheels, wheels not hanging low as would be if the car was jacked up.
Speaking of old VWs, don't forget they also had the gas tank in the front of the vehicle with only the spare tire in front of it. I don't know how much protection the tire would give in a front end collision.The original Corvair had only one CV joint per axle so the rear wheel would tend to tuck under in hard corners. This is less than optimum for handling but is the same as the Volkswagen bug. Nader went after GM instead of VW (in spite of the VW having a lot more cars on the road) because GM was such an attractive target.
The bug never got going fast enough to be a problem........I don't know how much protection the tire would give in a front end collision.
VW's initial response to safety criticism was 'rear engine'd, tail heavy, so they always spin and go off the road tail-first'. Really!The bug never got going fast enough to be a problem....
This was a great build!!!Especially this one: https://www.youtube.com/@MattsOffRoadRecovery
View attachment 776793View attachment 776794
It was rear engine, but not now!
After I asked my question I did a search for the same. This Will the Corvair kill you?The original Corvair had only one CV joint per axle so the rear wheel would tend to tuck under in hard corners. This is less than optimum for handling but is the same as the Volkswagen bug. Nader went after GM instead of VW (in spite of the VW having a lot more cars on the road) because GM was such an attractive target. The original Corvair wasn't all that bad but the second generation corrected it by adding a second CV joint making it handle very well. But by that time, with the safety campaign and the existing cooling problems, limited production volumn, etc. it was doomed.
Pintos were tough for what they were though. A couple of friends had them in high school and beat the crap out of them the way that only high school kids can do.2nd generation Corvairs were cool looking (65-69). Pintos, not so much IMHO. A Corvair rear engine station wagon was quite a vehicle.
Anecdotal:Were they really that bad or did Nader just find a way to create a name for himself?
Matt doesn't mess around and Lindsey is one awesome lady.Especially this one: https://www.youtube.com/@MattsOffRoadRecovery
View attachment 776793View attachment 776794
It was rear engine, but not now!
Anecdotal:
I saw the engine fall out of a Corvair onto the street when I was a kid.
It was 70s GM pickup saddle tanks. I can't remember if it was 60 minutes or 20 20.I saw one crash report (don't remember the vehicle) where they were showing the vehicle burst into flames when it was run into. They included the video in the report, but if you looked closely, the car caught fire before the impact. Something like 6" from impact you can see flames beginning. Turns out there was an explosive squib to force the results they wanted. Don't remember who did the "testing".
It was NBC Dateline. GM sued and won, got an apology and some financial settlement.It was 70s GM pickup saddle tanks. I can't remember if it was 60 minutes or 20 20.