BigBlue1
Veteran Member
I don't have the link handy, but the terms of service explicitly state that RV service users are de-prioritized compared to full service subscribers in the cell they are operating within. Very explicit info that says "RV use is a second-class citizen compared to full service". In short, if the infrastructure is being taxed it will give precedence to non-RV subscribers.What happens if a zone, that is not available yet, is oversold with the rv systems. Then when the infrastructure is in place to open the zone will we get degraded performance because more systems are on it than it was designed for or are we forced to wait longer because of the rv sales.
Its getting very close to fraud or at least very misleading agreements.
If you read the full terms of service for this it actually looks like it was well thought out and really does manage to allow more people access to the service in a flexible way while not negatively impacting existing subscribers.
It also gives the ability for non-RV users to acquire the service more quickly than their place on the waiting list as long as they are OK with potential service degradation compared to their cell peers that have full service.
Rob