Starlink

[metalheart]

Sounds like it works well for you and that comforting to know since I hope to plug our mesh into the Starlink router and hope that all goes well. If not then a direct plug into our mesh should be fine. Thanks for the insight.

 

[buckeyefarmer]

Might have to do some port forwarding. your internet traffic goes thru lots of routers, so that’s not an issue.

 

[BigBlue1]

Might have to do some port forwarding. your internet traffic goes thru lots of routers, so that’s not an issue.

What would you have to forward? What ports would require moving to another port?

 

[buckeyefarmer]

I like to forward my video cameras in my house so I can see them remote. Some ISPs will only forward a few standard ports, and won’t let you forward what you want. Or maybe you want remote access to a system in your house that uses http to access, but you can’t use port 80 because your web browsing uses it, so you redirect your system to another port at your router.

Double NAT is not a problem if they forward all ports, some ISPs won’t. Hughesnet wouldnt. I have no problem with my mobley.

 

[IXLR8]

There was some discussion on the Starlink Reddit forum that some mesh systems play nicely with SL, some others don't. I don't have a mesh system so I didn't pay much attention to the discussion.

 

[Alan W.]

Has anyone else got theirs yet? Seems like nothings happening in my area.
I really need to be able to tell Hughesnet to cram it. But I wait.

 

[cqaigy2]

Nothing here yet.

 

[ponytug]

Given that most of the satellites launched in the last six months are still ascending/drifting to final orbits, and that those satellites would bring Starlink over their magic 1200 number, I would guess another six months or late summer, or fall before non-beta customers start seeing shipments.There is also the not so small issue of the cost of "Dishy" and the ongoing global chip shortages that may be limiting production of "Dishy".

More information at Planet 489, if you are curious.

Personally, I can't wait.

All the best,

Peter

 

[rekees4300]

Has anyone else got theirs yet? Seems like nothings happening in my area.
I really need to be able to tell Hughesnet to cram it. But I wait.

Here in Indiana I've been waiting to hear from Starlink for 9 months. So far nothing but crickets.

Been there done that with Hughesnet. Told them to cram it 5 years ago when Verizon Wireless became available. It was a great pleasure to use my FEL to smash their dish into a pancake!

 

[John_Mc]

"The included router seems decent but not anything exceptional. The good thing is that you have options. You can plug your mesh system into the Starlink router for better home coverage or you can omit the Starlink router entirely and just use your own setup. I haven't heard of issues plugging a mesh into the Starlink router. I'm using mine like that the last few days as I've moved on to my next phase of testing/confidence with Starlink. What issues have you heard about?"

I am not a network person, so much of the details about the issues using a mesh router with the Starlink router have to do with "Double NAT" or two IP addresses behind the router. Apparently there is some workaround using a switch or some other changes to the second router, but I have not done a deep dive into the details. We have a number of devices that connect to our mesh system and a too large house so coverage issues for us were solved with the mesh router. When we get our Starlink I am hopeful we can continue to use the mesh system but I am not sure what we give up by excluding the SL router if it causes problems.

I'm not an expert at this, but I believe all you have to do is "dumb down" your mesh router by telling it not to issue IP addresses and plug it into your Starlink router. (it's been years since I've done this, but if I remember the terminology correctly, you turn off the DHCP server on your mesh router. ). Instead, it accepts addresses assigned by the Starlink Router. This avoids the "Double NAT" problem.

You might try asking on the Starlink Reddit - a group of users, some of whom are extremely knowledgable:

 

[buckeyefarmer]

^ yes

 

[buckeyefarmer]

Another batch of satellites went up.

 

[BigBlue1]

My service has been noticeably more stable in the last couple weeks than it was the first few. They made a system update around that time and I think it has helped a lot.

Rob

 

[Gale Hawkins]

Don't Try to Pirate Movies on SpaceX's Starlink

Interesting.

 

[Gale Hawkins]

Scientist predicted man named 'Elon' would colonise Mars in 1952 book

For what's it's worth.

 

[ernemats]

Starlink sighted over west central Pa. last night, does that mean we are getting close?

 

[Jim Shooz]

Don't think so. Starlink 21 is expected overhead here at 6.27pm on the 10th May 6.52pm on the 11th and Starlink 24 at 6.17pm on the 13th.
Nothing going on here.

 

[ponytug]

Starlink sighted over west central Pa. last night, does that mean we are getting close?

No, it is just that the recently launched satellites are in even lower orbit and clustered together that makes them much more visible.

The actual orbits are inclined to the poles, and the satellites are constantly in motion relative to the surface of the earth. They aren't geostationary satellites, so SpaceX needs something like a minimum of 1400 in orbit to provide continuous coverage.

Best guess is late summer/fall, but SpaceX and Elon Musk have added the caveat that service needs to be "stable". With the global shortage of chips, they may also be having difficulties sourcing chips for the dishes/receivers, but who really knows?

All the best,

Peter

 

[ernemats]

Darn, I was hoping a good sign

 

[ponytug]

I keep hoping, too.