Subcompact for hilly 3-acre

   / Subcompact for hilly 3-acre
  • Thread Starter
#21  
The majority of use will be used in a wooded area so I think I need to do some additional research on machine size/tire size/clearance also taking into consideration the competing spec of low CG for hill use. I have to balance these two things.
 
   / Subcompact for hilly 3-acre #22  
Hi All:

Considering a subcompact for property maintenance and landscaping projects. I have been looking at Kubota, Mahindra, Kioti and currently leaning toward a MF GC1723 configured at a TLB.

My property (residential, New Jersey):
3 acre
quite hilly
rocky soil
mostly wooded

Needs/wants:
Material movement, in particular, logs, split wood, mulch, soil, gravel
Would like a BH for planting shrubs and building retaining walls, grading for shed, etc
Do not need a mid mower (walk behind fine for my small lawn)
Possible snow clearing
Fork attachment would be nice

Some of my questions are:
Will a subcompact with 23-25 hp and 4wd be adequate for the above?
What tires would be best for a hilly, wooded lot? Clearing snow form a steep driveway?
Can a BH be added later for not too much extra?

Thanks,

Brian
check out the all electric drive Solectrac CET. Full torque developed at any motor rpm. Low center of gravity. Compatible with all compact implements. solectrac.com
 
   / Subcompact for hilly 3-acre #23  
The majority of use will be used in a wooded area so I think I need to do some additional research on machine size/tire size/clearance also taking into consideration the competing spec of low CG for hill use. I have to balance these two things.

One size up, like a Kubota B2301/B2601 would likely work best for your situation. I have a hilly property and the B2601 with 2" wheel spacers has proven to be a really capable and stable machine.

Mike
 
   / Subcompact for hilly 3-acre #24  
Hi All:

Considering a subcompact for property maintenance and landscaping projects. I have been looking at Kubota, Mahindra, Kioti and currently leaning toward a MF GC1723 configured at a TLB.

My property (residential, New Jersey):
3 acre
quite hilly
rocky soil
mostly wooded

Needs/wants:
Material movement, in particular, logs, split wood, mulch, soil, gravel
Would like a BH for planting shrubs and building retaining walls, grading for shed, etc
Do not need a mid mower (walk behind fine for my small lawn)
Possible snow clearing
Fork attachment would be nice

Some of my questions are:
Will a subcompact with 23-25 hp and 4wd be adequate for the above?
What tires would be best for a hilly, wooded lot? Clearing snow form a steep driveway?
Can a BH be added later for not too much extra?

Thanks,

Brian
Hey Brian, I’m a MF GC1725 owner and if you can find a Massey dealer that’s close enough, it’s a good bet. No BH but I agree with others that if you need it buy it with the tractor. This is my 2nd Subcompact Massey and with R4s and chains it can do a lot of work.
I think it’s better than any other brand.
 
   / Subcompact for hilly 3-acre #25  
I started out shopping subcompacts for 2-3 acres of hilly and partially wooded use. I quickly realized that a compact is what I really needed. A subcompact won't even pull my box blade up my gravel driveway once the box is full of material.

I'd suggest looking at the 35-40 HP compacts. Then you'll never wish you'd gotten more machine. I learned that the hard way.
 
   / Subcompact for hilly 3-acre #26  
Size really matters. While looking at tractors at the dealer is not the same as on your property, it is a start. SCUTs can do a lot, but they have a LOT of limitations. If you need mostly a mower and a baby tractor, a SCUT is a good choice. If you need to do you real tractor jobs, you need a real tractor. Now, there are those that will say even a 40-50HP tractor is not a real tractor. Once again, it depends on what tasks you need done and what kind of agility you need.

Very few people need the capability of Big Bud:
Big Bud 747
But, if you do, nothing smaller will satisfy you.

I don't think Big Bug would be a good choice for your needs, property, or pocketbook. I think a SCUT is too limited for what you said you wanted to do. A small CUT, like the Kubota B2601 is probably as small as you want to go (this is the small B in Kubota). The Kubota LX series is the new big B. The L series are the next size up. Then there are the M(monster) ones, but those are probably much bigger than what you want. There are lots of things that are important in tractors. For your listed needs HP is not one of those things. If you want the power for a large rotary cutter, flail mower, or snowblower, thinking about higher HP would be important. Otherwise, stay below 26ish HP and avoid the complicated emissions and DPF. Weight, loader and 3PH capacity are very important for your needs. More is generally better here and larger gets you more. Larger tractors are wider and some have better COG because of that. The small B series from Kubota is narrow. Wheel spacers would probably help. There are also comfort and feature differences in tractors. My B2620 does not have 3PH position control. The salesman was not able to explain the difference, nor did the Deere dealer. Had I known, I probably would have paid the extra $1.5K for the B2630. The 30 series has more comfort/convenience features and position control, but it is slightly bigger (taller, wider, longer, heavier). The B2601 has position control and some of the other features, so it is a good choice, if you want to stay on the small size. While many people say bigger is better, I say you really can go too big. I much prefer using smaller machines on my property and am in search of a baby tractor. For me that is one even smaller than a SCUT, so a large garden tractor. That might me three machines for my needs: mower/lawn/garden tractor, super garden tractor, small compact utility tractor. I don't often need the full capability of my CUT, but when I do nothing smaller will be big enough. With a baby tractor, I suspect it will get used more than the CUT, but less than the mower. I might be able to combine the mower and baby tractor, but I am not convinced that is a good idea.
 
   / Subcompact for hilly 3-acre
  • Thread Starter
#27  
I am not against a bigger machine, but I do need to keep size in mind for maneuverability in the woods and for storage as well. I will probably be reaching out to some dealers this week.
 
   / Subcompact for hilly 3-acre #28  
Agility (easier to spell and better meaning) is really hard to determine looking at the tractor at the dealer or even the spec sheet.

It may not be what you want to here, but REALLY thinking about the tasks you need to do is REALLY important. Think about the implements that will make that task possible and/or easy. You will likely end up with a list longer than you desire to pay. If it is a task that you do regularly, then having the ability to do it at a moments notice is great. If it is a task you might need to do every few years there might be cheaper/better solutions.

I thought I wanted a backhoe. I just didn't want it enough to pay the extra $7K. That $7K was much better spent (for my needs) on the chipper, grapple, QA, forks, grading scraper. Other than the forks, I have already used those things way more than I would have used the backhoe. If I really needed a backhoe, I would rent one for the weekend. That would be way cheaper and I wouldn't have to find a place to store it and/or have it in the way when I didn't need it (most of the time). There are many people that tell you a backhoe is indispensable. Multiple of my neighbors have one and I rarely see them use it. But some people might use it every week or so, I suppose. Just make sure you get one that is easy to put on and take off for when you need to use the 3PH or need some agility.

Think about how much you really need to be able to lift with the loader. My B2620 has significantly greater lift capacity than a SCUT. A 70+ foot hemlock came down in the last snow storm. Once the top half was cut off, it could no longer lift the end more than a little off the ground. But, once I got it all cut up, I was able to carry 7-8' logs (about 18" in diameter) with the grapple. The made it easy to move them where I wanted. A SCUT would not be able to do that. I would never have thought I needed to do that a decade ago. But, many of the hemlock trees are dying and no one is really sure why. So more will come down and when they block the trail something needs to be done. It is possible to use a bucket grapple or even bucket forks to do this. But that limits capacity even more and it really slows things down. If you have lots of time, that might not matter to you.

As far as agility goes turning circle is one measure. But, when you have an implement on the back (or a backhoe) and a loader in the front, you have something that is large. If your trails a really roads or even driveway sized any of the tractor sizes will be fine. If you want the woodland trail feel, the big B is probably as large as you should go, but the B2601 (small B size) or the Deere 2 series (if you like green better) are good choices. They are priced similarly (green was more $ the last time I looked) and similarly equipped. The B2601 is available with the SSQA bucket. The Deere comes with their lighter, similarly easy, but not compatible system. Many people say SSQA is better because you can find deals on skid steer attachments. That is true in some places, but those attachments eat up a LOT of lift capacity, since they are designed for MUCH more capable machines.

But, go look at the machines to get an idea of size. SCUTs are easy to step up on. Small CUTs like the B2601 are easy if you are relatively agile yourself. The big B size and larger typically need a step to make it reasonably easy to get up on the tractor. See which feels better to you. Do you like the feeling you get being so high up. How about when a low tree branch whacks you in the face? You will need the tools to take care of that even with a SCUT, so probably not a good reason to not get a big tractor.

When I went by the dealer, they were low on tractors. They had a lot of BX's with backhoes, but only one without. They had one B2601, without backhoe. They had more of the larger ones. I hear supply is tight, at least partly due to Covid-19.

Unless you really are in a hurry, take your time to make a really good decision. I see lots of lightly used SCUTs, probably because people discover they really needed a bigger tractor. On the other hand, my old neighbor had a Case 580K. It was a giant and way too big for my trails, but was okay on the driveway, which is what he used it for. But, since he has been gone I have doing fine with my B2620 on the driveway maintenance (a SCUT could probably do it, but it would probably take longer)
 
   / Subcompact for hilly 3-acre #29  
I mean look, if you're looking to do a bunch of work in the woods, you're probably gonna want a grapple, which means you'll need counterweight, and you might as well have a useful implement in the back hanging there for that purpose, eg: backhoe. Now that is a useful tractor for digging and hauling stuff away. Just out of curiosity, has anybody ever mounted bigger wheels/tires on a scut such as the gc17xx?
 
   / Subcompact for hilly 3-acre
  • Thread Starter
#30  
Would love a grapple in theory but I don't think the cost is justified for my use case. I can move rounds with the loader and larger items with the forks which would be rare since I usually cut logs where they lie. Definitely getting forks.

Had a chat with the local MF dealer and am pleased with their level of helpfulness so far. Will be trying out a CG1723EB tomorrow or Saturday to try to get a feel if it will be adequate for my property/tasks. If it seems too borderline will look up line.
 
 
Top