What was Kubota thinking?

   / What was Kubota thinking? #41  
gbick said:
GI consider steering brakes manditory-yes, even on a 4wd cut. I went to the Kubota dealer fully expecting to come home with a 30ish hp hydrostatic loader tractor because I know they make a fine product. WHAT??? Hydro and brakes on the same side!! I DON'T HAVE 2 RIGHT FEET!! On to the JD dealer. THE FIRST thing to see is the pedal setup. YES, they are configured sanely! I am now the proud owner of a JD 4310.

I would offer that there are applications where steering brakes are useful. For the typical SCUT and CUT user though, they are not often useful, given 4wd and power steering.

On a 4wd, steering brakes are not useful unless you use 2wd. Otherwise, you are binding up the drive train and dragging the front end excessively. I have tried it with my B8200 4wd HST. 2WD, was ok, 4wd with steering brakes was useless.

Note also, at least in my post, IMHO. Your mileage may vary.
 
   / What was Kubota thinking? #42  
When I am pushing snow, and my front tires are spinning 10 inches above the pavement, steering brakes are my only directional control.Greg.
 
   / What was Kubota thinking? #43  
Now GOOD NIGHT! and I MEAN it this time. Greg.
 
   / What was Kubota thinking? #44  
Wow guys, you're in fire tonight.

I said earlier that I didn't like that setup very much on my B3030. BUT, I don't use brake steer on the lawn, it ruins it in no time. I don't use it on paved ground, it eats the tires. So the only use left is, like many other TBNers said, for agriculture applications. I don't do that kind of work with my tractor. So, that means I don't use brake steer at all. Ok, I don't like the setup but I never use it anyways. That's why I'm very happy with my tractor even if that setup isn't perfect IMHO. I still believe that Kubota produces great tractors.
 
   / What was Kubota thinking? #45  
gbick said:
When I am pushing snow, and my front tires are spinning 10 inches above the pavement, steering brakes are my only directional control.Greg.

Yep, thats what I hear. If you want hydrostatic and push snow around, I would suggest you look beyond Kubota. Other then that, I personally would have no compelling reason for differential braking. I used it on occasion with my International 2WD but once I got a hydrostatic, doing a quick y turn was so fast and easy, I never felt like it would be necessary. I tried it a few times with the cruise control, works great but cruise only works in forward so no backwards and split brakes, at least, not easily.
 
   / What was Kubota thinking? #46  
On the new L 40 series, the brake pedals are inboard from the hydrostatic foot pedal. Kubota must have heard us grumbling!
 
   / What was Kubota thinking? #47  
I don't have steering brakes on my BX and never needed them. They Are mandatory when making a turn at the end of the field on the old family White when discing (sp) the field in order to get turned back in one disc width. Jeesh ya make one extra pass down the field and you hear about it all summer.
"See where the corn is shorter there, you packed it down more in that row."
 
   / What was Kubota thinking? #48  
Berniep said:
I don't have steering brakes on my BX and never needed them. They Are mandatory when making a turn at the end of the field on the old family White when discing (sp) the field in order to get turned back in one disc width. Jeesh ya make one extra pass down the field and you hear about it all summer.
"See where the corn is shorter there, you packed it down more in that row."

Interesting Bernie. Compaction has much more to do with root growth then we think and why low pressure extra large tires are becoming so common in new agricultural tractors.
 
   / What was Kubota thinking? #49  
<RobertN
On a 4wd, steering brakes are not useful unless you use 2wd. Otherwise, you are binding up the drive train and dragging the front end excessively.>

The brake only works on the rear tires and they push the front around. The “binding” really isn’t an issue in loose ground.

<Gbick
When I am pushing snow, and my front tires are spinning 10 inches above the pavement, steering brakes are my only directional control.>

Snow removal is the second biggest reason people buy SCUT and CUTs and it doesn’t make much sense to me to not have that feature. Even with the front wheels on the ground ice patches are a steering/traction challenge only compounded without steering brake control.

<RaT_
I personally would have no compelling reason for differential braking. I used it on occasion with my International 2WD but once I got a hydrostatic, doing a quick y turn was so fast and easy, I never felt like it would be necessary.>

That “y turn” isn’t available with a “drag” implement (and to me, is still a PITA). I don’t want a tire puckered by backing over my spike harrow trying to turn around.

<Stef
I don't use brake steer on the lawn, it ruins it in no time. I don't use it on paved ground, it eats the tires. So the only use left is, like many other TBNers said, for agriculture applications. I don't do that kind of work with my tractor. So, that means I don't use brake steer at all. Ok, I don't like the setup but I never use it anyways. That's why I'm very happy with my tractor even if that setup isn't perfect IMHO.>

This really is the point. Most SCUT and CUT owners mow and move snow. They don’t do much agriculture/ground work, and what they do is pretty small scale with 3 point attachments and no real row crops. The diff lock and power steering works well enough to forget about or never learn the advantages of real steering brakes in low traction and tricky maneuvering situations. I am happy with my bx23 and I don’t mow or move snow but is without steering brakes and I do miss them. It is pretty funny for so many to defend a poor design though.
 
   / What was Kubota thinking? #50  
bx23barry said:
<RobertN
On a 4wd, steering brakes are not useful unless you use 2wd. Otherwise, you are binding up the drive train and dragging the front end excessively.>

The brake only works on the rear tires and they push the front around. The “binding” really isn’t an issue in loose ground.

It is pretty funny for so many to defend a poor design though.

I am not defending the lack of steering brakes. I have no use for them, so it does not matter either way. From years and years of 4-wheeling expierience in tractors, Jeeps, and pickups, my personal expierience has been that running a turning brake while in 4wd will stress the drive train. Although my Kubota only has brakes on the rear axle, once the 4wd lever is engaged, it engages and stresses the front end and drive train when hitting the steering brakes.

Part of the steering brakes is left over from gear tractors; my B8200 was available new with 2wd or 4wd, gear or HST. I have seen the gear versions, and could see where the steering brakes would work much easier because you did not have to hit the brake and HST at the same time.

I am not so sure it is a poor design, as these CUTS were not designed to do that. It's kind of like years back, if you looked at the front of tractors there were holes for the hand crank to turn over the engine. Even though they had electrical systems and starters.

It is interesting trying it though. In 2wd, with big feet stomping the brake and the HST, mine will spin on a dime. It is much easier on my gear tranny Farmall-A though.
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

UNUSED FUTURE LASER LEVEL W/ TRIPOD (A51243)
UNUSED FUTURE...
Massey Ferguson 65 Tractor (AS IS) (A50774)
Massey Ferguson 65...
(3) UNUSED FUTURE JUMPER CABLES (A51243)
(3) UNUSED FUTURE...
2005 Dodge Caravan Van (A51694)
2005 Dodge Caravan...
2014 BMW X3 (A50324)
2014 BMW X3 (A50324)
Case IH 1063 Corn Head (A50514)
Case IH 1063 Corn...
 
Top