:redflag:
Does your red flag mean "Danger" or Socialist Revolution? Just curious.
:redflag:
I'm on the fence regarding the addition and use of 'like' 'dislike' buttons not wanting it to becoming a popularity contest.Thread reopened for constructive feedback.
I'm on the fence regarding the addition and use of 'like' 'dislike' buttons not wanting it to becoming a popularity contest.
Personally I would use them on occasion, even responding with a 'like' to an opinion differing my own if it was logically argued.
Like Doofy - I can choose what to read. The remainder will just fall by the wayside.
Thread reopened for constructive feedback.
Danger, when Mohammad reopens a thread, unless I am careful, I surely will stick my foot in my mouth
Not sure if I have any constructive criticism other than what I've conveyed to you except to say to say that when a thread goes south (any thread on any sub forum), it usually has a select group of posters (like 4), putting holes in the hull and sinking the ship. That plays out 99% of the time and always the same select group. It's like they hover over the forum, like vultures waiting to pounce.
Then they go for the jugular and the thread gets closed. Seen that play out time and time again on here.
Addressing that, you already know my response to that issue.
I've kind thought about new models for moderation that could reward the good and purge the not so good with some degree of accuracy... let me know if you have suggestions for something like that outside of just more moderation.
Thread reopened for constructive feedback.
+1... get rid of less than half a dozen people and the problem is solved. Two warnings, then third strike "YOUR OUT!"
There are a few that will always just never get it and never understand that "they" are the problem.
Maybe a block button to make those people not exist would eventually take away the attention that they are after and they will go away.
