I don't know of any change in winds. There might be one due to climate change, I just haven't heard of it. Big mature trees are the most resistant to fire. Smaller trees burn more easily and a fire in one can crown out more readily and then ladder into the larger trees. Clear cut logging wouldreduce fire danger until the replanted trees (and brush if it's not treated) grows for a few years. Then it's worse than a mature forest until it becomes one. And clear cutting has other downsides. Select cutting removes the most valuable trees, which are also the ones that are most resistant to fire. So it doesn't help either. Removing the large number of beetle kill trees would help reduce the fuel load but after a few years they're not worth much commercially (if at all as beetle kill wood is often stained). Even if the USFS green lighted all logging the loggers would not be able to get to more than a fraction of them while they're worth something. I have seen harvesting start really quick on fire killed trees... like when the fire's just contained not officially out. I don't blame the build up of fuels on a lack of logging. We're already logging about as much as we can given the prices of timber (making some trees uneconomical to harvest) and wanting to leave forests for future generations to enjoy and harvest.