jdmar
Gold Member
You are building like I did mine 2 years ago. My own design with Superior wall basement they are dry!!!). I also used SIPS but traditional trussed roof with spray foam. I would go with SIPS again.
The SIPS are very stiff/strong, the house is very quiet, and very warm. We use only about 11 BTU/hr/square foot of heated space. Yes that includes my basement and garage...but they are both radiant floor heated...so I think it counts. The SIPs did add about 12K to the price but the payback is immediate. What I mean is that the slight increase that I spend per month on mortgage is more than covered by the decrease on heat and cooling each month. In fact in 2 years we have only turned AC on for about a total of 4-5 days...and then only one of the two small units. Some would say that the payback is 30 years for SIPS but I also look at my $ out per month...the SIPs lesson that total amount.
I have the garage and rooms over the garage as traditional framed with spray foam. I then have 1" polyfoam sheets with foil over those studs...then the drywall. This is NOT as warm as the SIP areas.--just for a comparison. When I retire and move to a small cabin (I hope) I may try ICFs with even higher r-value and greater thermal mass for solar.
I also have about 45 windows (crazy I know) but they are just Anderson 200 series. They are reasonable U/R value with reasonable cost. They are low-e and that helps a lot. When the sun shines the heat never turns on. I have become a big believer in modified building ideas to save energy and cost. We are not yet "there" as a nation but hopefully will be soon.
Sorry about the long post, but I think the SIPs and other technologies have a great benefit...and not just in energy efficiency. They are quiet, use less stick lumber and more OSB (rapid growth and renewable trees). By the way...I am not even a tree-hugging hippie!
Peter
The SIPS are very stiff/strong, the house is very quiet, and very warm. We use only about 11 BTU/hr/square foot of heated space. Yes that includes my basement and garage...but they are both radiant floor heated...so I think it counts. The SIPs did add about 12K to the price but the payback is immediate. What I mean is that the slight increase that I spend per month on mortgage is more than covered by the decrease on heat and cooling each month. In fact in 2 years we have only turned AC on for about a total of 4-5 days...and then only one of the two small units. Some would say that the payback is 30 years for SIPS but I also look at my $ out per month...the SIPs lesson that total amount.
I have the garage and rooms over the garage as traditional framed with spray foam. I then have 1" polyfoam sheets with foil over those studs...then the drywall. This is NOT as warm as the SIP areas.--just for a comparison. When I retire and move to a small cabin (I hope) I may try ICFs with even higher r-value and greater thermal mass for solar.
I also have about 45 windows (crazy I know) but they are just Anderson 200 series. They are reasonable U/R value with reasonable cost. They are low-e and that helps a lot. When the sun shines the heat never turns on. I have become a big believer in modified building ideas to save energy and cost. We are not yet "there" as a nation but hopefully will be soon.
Sorry about the long post, but I think the SIPs and other technologies have a great benefit...and not just in energy efficiency. They are quiet, use less stick lumber and more OSB (rapid growth and renewable trees). By the way...I am not even a tree-hugging hippie!
Peter