8NTX
Gold Member
Re: If you\'re causcasian you\'re in big trouble
Harv wrote: "The only ones that are hurt by not speaking english are the ones not speaking english. But it appears for some folks that isn't enough. They want to bring down the full force of the law to make sure that those who don't speak english are really punished. Like they aren't punished enough."
I don't agree with this statement. Those who do not speak English tend to fall onto the bottom rung of society, and as a result, it puts a strain on the social services freely given to them. The cost of providing health care, child care, and public services to illegal aliens and/or non-English speaking Americans is staggering. The trickle down theory in reverse, so to speak. There are also costs to provide ESL teachers...the list goes on and on.
Harv you can travel from where you are just a few miles to the southwest into parts of Garland and Richardson where there are vast numbers of oriental families, businesses, etc. For the most part, they seem to be doing well. Lots of business have no English-speaking employees and do not cater to "Americans". They do not consider themselves American, and they remain immersed in their own culture. Is this good or bad? Lots of these people live happily and have virtually no negative impact on society in general. But as a rule, a larger percentage of this community will tend to rely on public services including welfare, police protection, public health services, etc. It IS a drain on the system, and it DOES make these services more costly to us all.
The problem arises when these people, who do not consider themselves to be American, expect the full benefits of being a citizen (whether they have the legal right or not). This results in isolationism, resentment, and bigotry. Who wins? I am not in favor of denying health care or police protection to anyone. Like I have said before, there are no easy solutions. But having English as the "official language" is a start, along with changes in the school system, and tightening the borders.
Harv wrote: "The only ones that are hurt by not speaking english are the ones not speaking english. But it appears for some folks that isn't enough. They want to bring down the full force of the law to make sure that those who don't speak english are really punished. Like they aren't punished enough."
I don't agree with this statement. Those who do not speak English tend to fall onto the bottom rung of society, and as a result, it puts a strain on the social services freely given to them. The cost of providing health care, child care, and public services to illegal aliens and/or non-English speaking Americans is staggering. The trickle down theory in reverse, so to speak. There are also costs to provide ESL teachers...the list goes on and on.
Harv you can travel from where you are just a few miles to the southwest into parts of Garland and Richardson where there are vast numbers of oriental families, businesses, etc. For the most part, they seem to be doing well. Lots of business have no English-speaking employees and do not cater to "Americans". They do not consider themselves American, and they remain immersed in their own culture. Is this good or bad? Lots of these people live happily and have virtually no negative impact on society in general. But as a rule, a larger percentage of this community will tend to rely on public services including welfare, police protection, public health services, etc. It IS a drain on the system, and it DOES make these services more costly to us all.
The problem arises when these people, who do not consider themselves to be American, expect the full benefits of being a citizen (whether they have the legal right or not). This results in isolationism, resentment, and bigotry. Who wins? I am not in favor of denying health care or police protection to anyone. Like I have said before, there are no easy solutions. But having English as the "official language" is a start, along with changes in the school system, and tightening the borders.