Gronk
Member
I will elaborate and try to keep it short. I was financially at my limit to aquire a 35 hp tractor, so the added expense of FEL and Backhoe was beyound my budget. A further issue for me was maintenance access FEL are rather restrictive for the engine area to work on. I agree that the Full frame mounting for the backhoe would benefit the strengh issue versus the 3 pt. for farm style tractors. In my case I needed full access for 3 pt. attachments for farming activities and did not want fight the backhoe on and off. Years ago, I had a old Ford 800 series with FEL and it was a pain to work on the engine with the loader frame in the way. The more hydraulic attachments the more chances for hydraulic leaks. I was a construction mechanic for many years and, now, I like very simple tools that don't leak expensive oil. A older commercial construction style loader backhoe may have some merit if your soley looking at loader and backhoe operations. Look at all your options. bjr
Thanks bjr,
I think it just boils down to our needs being very different. I am purchasing a tractor specifically to have a FEL and backhoe so I have considered the points you made about access and serviceability and I am comfortable with those compromises. I did look at older commercial units but they usually cannot also power rear finishing mowers, box blades and post-hole diggers, other implements that I will be requiring. A tractor is really my only do-all option so I must do my homework and choose wisely.
Sean




