Kubie Two,
As original poster, you are way off base regarding this thread. This is not a safety thread, ambulance-chaser thread or stupid operator thread. They seem like good thread ideas and maybe you should start one.
This thread was only done as a visual indication of a well known problem with the BX 50 series transmission. The existence of the problem is acknowledged by Kubota through attempted fixes, buy-backs, and eventually a redesign (60 series).
Your unfounded personal attacks sounds like you might be dealing with some issues yourself. Good luck with that.
The opinions were expressed after "many" people had the opportunity to present their thoughts, and the sum of these became the basis for my conclusions. My comments opened with use of the word 杜any as well, however with the intent of including some and excluding some. The comments also suggested operational expectations were adversely impacted for 杜any by at least one or more characteristics. This provided a multiple-choice selection of a lot of things to consider, none of which were personal. As they read, all can decide they are very capable equipment operators (rightly or wrongly), so NONE of the comments would apply to those who considered themselves experts. Others might conclude that they are indeed missing knowledge or skill that could be improved. They might recognize their ability to modulate the automobile accelerator to avoid crashing into the car in front of them, or their ability to apply brakes without smoking the tires, and conclude improved skills and knowledge could assist with tractor operation. Rather than continuing to believe hydrostatic drives are automatic transmissions, and forward/reverse controls are equivalent to accelerators, they learn the differences and adjust operational actions based on the new understanding. Skills improve and equipment reactions more closely match expectations. Teen drivers could be used as an analogy on one extreme and VERY elderly drivers on the other...
Others might skip tractor comments completely and conclude that every comment made by anybody who did not agree with them was a personal attack, focused directly at them. These are all unconstrained, individually driven selections. Books have been written to discuss the concepts of perceived persecution so there is no need to go there because my comments were never directed to a single individual or group of individuals, nor were they ever personal. The transition, if any was made, took place within the reader.
I make no apologies for any comments made. These forums offer everybody the ability to express opinions that may not agree with others. I still think there is more than enough evidence presented in the thread to conclude that tractor ownership is likely beyond the capabilities of some. Interesting word 都ome. Like 杜any? it does not mean the same as 殿ll. I did not select any to be put on this list. Nor did I select any as having 妬ssues ?f any description. Any who put themselves on a list or lists did so on their own. I am certainly not qualified to decide who has personality issues, or who has total operational ineptness, or who might just need a 鍍weak. However, if they chose to put themselves on a list, who am I to argue? From the overall thread, there is also the possibility that some have learned that skills improvements can be helpful to them. Most of us read these threads to try to make ourselves better in some aspect.
I could close by saying I never had any kind of tool, tractor, implement, vehicle?hat didn稚 have things that could be made better, but I have always been able to do with it pretty much whatever I wanted to do. If any of these failed to meet my expectations because of something I could do better, I made more progress by improving myself than hoping for some immediate engineering fix. Almost everything that has ever been invented has gotten better over time, for a multitude of reasons that shouldn稚 need explaining here. Years later, and models later, there are ALWAYS opportunities for improvement.
I stand by the opinions earlier expressed and repeat that each is free to measure your own capabilities as you see fit. If you shouldn稚 own and operate a tractor, your ability to recognize that fact may be very similar to that of an elderly person who no longer possesses the required skills to own and drive an automobile. Both will be certain they have the necessary skills and nothing written here is likely to change that. Such is..
Although "feelings" and "issues" are a bit out of place here, practicing psychologists have always been free to interject their 兎xpert issue-analysis. I am probably older than most who post here, so be aware I am not into PC or into psycho-babble. I probably won't take any comments personal, even if intended. I am already well aware of the things I do well, and at least a lot of those I don稚, so if diagnosing 妬ssues soothes your own nerves, have at it. 溺any who read these posts will interpret content and form their own opinions of who has what. There will be some who support my position and some who don't. That was expected from the beginning.