Shuttle versus HST

/ Shuttle versus HST #41  

Attachments

  • DSCF3327.jpg
    DSCF3327.jpg
    753.9 KB · Views: 110
/ Shuttle versus HST #42  
I to love the HST as it offers so much control on a steep hillside even. I have countless times enjoyed the fact that I could move the tractor less then a inch with precision control. Now, what I hate about HST tractors is the fact that "HST" means never made in america, or asian tractor, why do we put up with this? I am looking for a larger utility tractor something in the 5000lb 4 wheel drive 40 to 75 HP size. there is nothing much that will fit my needs in HST. I for one think its a shame that New Holland will buy and paint blue any asian tractor they can find. Look at how many times the under 100 cubic inch compacts have changed engines!
Think about what this means to the guy wanting to find parts in 10 years. I for one would gladly pay more for something made in america.

I understand that frustration. If you are willing to spend some serious bucks in newer tractors, you can find models in that HP range with HST. In my opinion 60HP and up should be shuttle trans. Not pimping Kubota, but they build tractors up toward that 60HP number with HST.

I've owned HST, gear, and now Hydraulic Shuttle. I prefer HST in my JD that I mow with. I prefer the shuttle in my M9540. I work in the timber a lot. The precision that others seem to claim with HST I never found. If your HST tractor is designed so that you cannot run the HST pedal and the brakes at the same time precision becomes unattainable when trying to keep from driving into a steep ditch or running off a sharp bluff.
 
/ Shuttle versus HST #43  
I hear ya James. Murph is like me,,,, never quite satisfied. :)

What I find ironic is we think nothing of putting a 300 horsepower engine in our lightweight sheet metal boxes we call automobiles, yet my tractor when fully loaded with its loader and rear ballast, loaded tires and my fat A in the seat weight somewhere around 6000 lbs and it has a 38 horsepower engine at the crankshaft, and nets way less than that after going thru the hydro and gear train. Yes I know it is geared way lower, less for speed and more for torque, but still it has to pack all that up steep hills around here. We think of 60 horsepower and up tractors as being very powerful machines, but still the horsepower to weight ratio is pretty small compared to a car.. Now lets compare it to a modern motorcycle. Lets see 125 horsepower, and maybe 600 lbs..?

This summer I was wishing for more horsepower when I was hauling stone from my neighbors house and back to mine. The route of course has some rather severe hills, and one in particular requires a stop and when you pull out you are facing a steep hill. I could not make it in HI range very well.. Oh it would do it, but the engine was really puffing and wanting to drop RPM pretty bad unless I let off of the hydro pedal. So I climbed it in MED. It was just as fast in MED with full pedal as it was in HI with having to back off. I could have used some more ponies. But hard to use ponies you did not buy. Ninety nine percent of the time I cannot make use of any more horsepower in my normal tasks. But roading a tractor around here does take some of the wind out of its sails. Now I guess if I lived in Kansas or some other flat area, it would be a different story.
 
/ Shuttle versus HST #44  
I much prefer hyd . shuttle over hydrostat . Foot throttle and shuttle for loader work .

Many of the newer HST's offer a linked pedal. That is, the pedal position is linked to RPM's as well as travel speed. Essentially, that gives you a similar experience to what you're talking about with shuttle.

Massey, Kubota, Yanmar, and the new Kioti NX tractors offer this.

I understand that frustration. If you are willing to spend some serious bucks in newer tractors, you can find models in that HP range with HST. In my opinion 60HP and up should be shuttle trans. Not pimping Kubota, but they build tractors up toward that 60HP number with HST.

I've owned HST, gear, and now Hydraulic Shuttle. I prefer HST in my JD that I mow with. I prefer the shuttle in my M9540. I work in the timber a lot. The precision that others seem to claim with HST I never found. If your HST tractor is designed so that you cannot run the HST pedal and the brakes at the same time precision becomes unattainable when trying to keep from driving into a steep ditch or running off a sharp bluff.

Massey 1759 (59)
Kubota L6060 (60)
Kioti NX 6010 (60)
Mahindra 6010 (60)
JD 4720 (66)
TYM T554 (55)

All high HP HST's.

And I can't agree with you on the lack of HST precision. Precision operation is one of the main reasons I need HST. I've owned shuttle before, wasn't a fan. Although, I use mine for work so I suppose I do much more precision work than you get into.
 
/ Shuttle versus HST #45  
And I can't agree with you on the lack of HST precision. Precision operation is one of the main reasons I need HST. I've owned shuttle before, wasn't a fan. Although, I use mine for work so I suppose I do much more precision work than you get into.

I agree with you about hst being more precise. Quite a bit more precise in my opinion, but what Richard was saying was that in some setups it's tough to use the steering brakes while operating the hst pedal. I can't speak for all hst tractors, of course. It is definitely possible on my MX. Were it not possible, or convenient to use the steering brakes, that would in my opinion be a problem in some situations, especially in an ag or logging setting.
 
/ Shuttle versus HST #46  
I agree with you about hst being more precise. Quite a bit more precise in my opinion, but what Richard was saying was that in some setups it's tough to use the steering brakes while operating the hst pedal. I can't speak for all hst tractors, of course. It is definitely possible on my MX. Were it not possible, or convenient to use the steering brakes, that would in my opinion be a problem in some situations, especially in an ag or logging setting.

Yeah I can see how the funky pedal location on the Grand L tractors could make brake steering less than convenient. The traditional setup with left side brakes makes precision HST & braking operation a breeze.
 
/ Shuttle versus HST #47  
I routinely use an HST L5740 and hydro-shuttle M8540 and there is no way I can approach the precision of he L5740 with the 8540 which is one reason I've considered a creeper kit on the 8540; love the tractor, but I'm much more comfortable operating near ditches, drop-offs etc. I'm only an occasional user, so my results may well differ from the regular users with lots more experience.
 
/ Shuttle versus HST #48  
Yeah I can see how the funky pedal location on the Grand L tractors could make brake steering less than convenient. The traditional setup with left side brakes makes precision HST & braking operation a breeze.

Grand L60's now have left foot brakes unlike my L40, so that's no longer an issue.
 
/ Shuttle versus HST #49  
I sure wouldn't limit my self to one brand regardless of closeness of dealer. There are many fine tractors that are just as good as Kubota and Kioti, LS tractors for instance and most times a few to several thousand cheaper for a similar tractor but with more standard options.

I don't worry so much about closeness of dealer when looking at tractors. Chances are, you wont ever have to send the tractor in for repair, just get some consumable parts when you buy the tractor (oil, fuel, air & HST filters) and you will be set for several years of maintenance without having to go back to the dealer. If you can get a much better deal at a more distance dealer, evaluate it for overall pricing and quality.
 
/ Shuttle versus HST #50  
What I find ironic is we think nothing of putting a 300 horsepower engine in our lightweight sheet metal boxes we call automobiles, yet my tractor when fully loaded with its loader and rear ballast, loaded tires and my fat A in the seat weight somewhere around 6000 lbs and it has a 38 horsepower engine at the crankshaft, and nets way less than that after going thru the hydro and gear train. Yes I know it is geared way lower, less for speed and more for torque, but still it has to pack all that up steep hills around here. We think of 60 horsepower and up tractors as being very powerful machines, but still the horsepower to weight ratio is pretty small compared to a car.. Now lets compare it to a modern motorcycle. Lets see 125 horsepower, and maybe 600 lbs..?

This summer I was wishing for more horsepower when I was hauling stone from my neighbors house and back to mine. The route of course has some rather severe hills, and one in particular requires a stop and when you pull out you are facing a steep hill. I could not make it in HI range very well.. Oh it would do it, but the engine was really puffing and wanting to drop RPM pretty bad unless I let off of the hydro pedal. So I climbed it in MED. It was just as fast in MED with full pedal as it was in HI with having to back off. I could have used some more ponies. But hard to use ponies you did not buy. Ninety nine percent of the time I cannot make use of any more horsepower in my normal tasks. But roading a tractor around here does take some of the wind out of its sails. Now I guess if I lived in Kansas or some other flat area, it would be a different story.


Good points James. And especially about using all our tractor's HP. Very rare. 90% of the time my hand throttle is set at an idle. I use the foot pedal when more ground speed is needed. But the hard work tasks done at a stop or near stop are almost always done at idle. But I sure like having that HP when needed. I often road my tractor and it takes a pretty severe hill for it to not pull it in high gear at 20mph +.
 
/ Shuttle versus HST #51  
And I can't agree with you on the lack of HST precision. Precision operation is one of the main reasons I need HST. I've owned shuttle before, wasn't a fan. Although, I use mine for work so I suppose I do much more precision work than you get into.

Not sure about who gets into more precision work. I almost always have my Grapple on and that requires fine precision. The difference is most of your work is on relatively flat ground. There HST shines. Terrain flat enough that when you lift your foot off the HST pedal the tractor actually stops in place. No HST will hold a tractor in an exact position on steep terrain without cheating and leaning on the reverse direction pedal or using the brakes. Get on an incline so steep you can't negotiate it in 2wd, then Shuttle shines for me. And as I mentioned earlier, the vast majority of the time my engine is at idle.

These different needs and preferences are why they make both kinds. :)
 
/ Shuttle versus HST #52  
RPM control
break control
direction control
MPH (miles per hour) how fast control

and of course on a steep hill, and 6" = difference between rolling down hill and flipping tractor a few times over. or getting things done, and making things look good.

when i say control it needs be not set and forget option or, and automated adjusted option, but foot/hand control that i can physically adjust all 4 at the same time.

===================
does above sound more like what ya folks talking about and having issue with some control layouts?
 
/ Shuttle versus HST #53  
Grand L60's now have left foot brakes unlike my L40, so that's no longer an issue.

My Brother's L3240 had the brake pedals located more toward the center. There was just enough floorboard room to get your left leg jacked around so you "could" operate the brakes and the HST pedals at the same time.
 
/ Shuttle versus HST #54  
HST = hydro static transmissions...

they have huge torque little speed = high RPM's = choose a gear, push peddle down a little bit.
they have low torque, high speed = high RPM's = choose a gear, push peddle all the way down.

if you use too high of a gear in a HST and pedal to the metal, and loose ground speed, internal by pass valves are opening up. letting fluid by pass things. causing extra heat, "truly wish they put a heat sensor on the oil in hyd transmissions" along with a sensor / dummy light, letting you know by pass valve opening up. so folks could better adjust things. and actually work towards true power output of an HST. vs just guessing.

HST = a lot of extra internal leakage. if ya run them in to high of gear vs torque ya applying on them. ya basically forcing oil to be pushed through small little gaps, = lots of friction and extra heat build up.

if ya loosing ground speed, you more likely able to get a higher ground speed. if ya drop to a lower gear and push pedal all the way down. vs trying to run in a higher gear and only partially pushing down the pedal. due to by pass valves opening up / internal leakage of HST.
 
/ Shuttle versus HST #55  
My Brother's L3240 had the brake pedals located more toward the center. There was just enough floorboard room to get your left leg jacked around so you "could" operate the brakes and the HST pedals at the same time.

That's the way my L5740 is and it's a lot better than on our previous L5030. I rarely if ever use the brakes on it, but my son does. If I do, I just use the cruise control and brakes, I often use the cruise control rather than foot pedal anyway especially on rough terrain.
 
/ Shuttle versus HST #56  
That's the way my L5740 is and it's a lot better than on our previous L5030. I rarely if ever use the brakes on it, but my son does. If I do, I just use the cruise control and brakes, I often use the cruise control rather than foot pedal anyway especially on rough terrain.

Yep, I was thinking of you in this discussion Larry, knowing you regularly operate both kinds. I only ran my Brother's L3240 intermittently. I was always reaching for the shuttle lever to change directions. :)
 
/ Shuttle versus HST #57  
Not sure about who gets into more precision work. I almost always have my Grapple on and that requires fine precision. The difference is most of your work is on relatively flat ground. There HST shines. Terrain flat enough that when you lift your foot off the HST pedal the tractor actually stops in place. No HST will hold a tractor in an exact position on steep terrain without cheating and leaning on the reverse direction pedal or using the brakes. Get on an incline so steep you can't negotiate it in 2wd, then Shuttle shines for me. And as I mentioned earlier, the vast majority of the time my engine is at idle.

These different needs and preferences are why they make both kinds. :)

That's weird, I found the opposite... I think HST is MUCH more controllable on sloped. One foot on the go pedal, one covering the brakes if/when needed.

With shuttle, you're constantly monitoring the clutch, brakes, and the go pedal. Doing the math, carry the 1, that's one extra pedal for a two legged person!
 
/ Shuttle versus HST #58  
That's weird, I found the opposite... I think HST is MUCH more controllable on sloped. One foot on the go pedal, one covering the brakes if/when needed.

With shuttle, you're constantly monitoring the clutch, brakes, and the go pedal. Doing the math, carry the 1, that's one extra pedal for a two legged person!


As I've said in this thread several times, if you can run the brakes and the HST pedal at the same time, no problem. If you can't, problem.

Not even going to touch some of the statements HST operators make about "never" using the brakes. Again, on relatively level terrain, no problem. On steep terrain, problem.

Many times I've had my HST tractors in situations where returning the HST pedals to neutral would not stop the machine from moving.

Not sure what the "go pedal" is, my tractor doesn't have one of those.

So, you are running two pedals, HST and brakes. I am running two pedals, clutch and brakes. :confused3:
 
/ Shuttle versus HST #59  
The go pedal is what many people call the pedal on a hst that makes you go. Can't call it a throttle or gas pedal...

My hst will hold reasonably well in medium on moderate slopes. In low on steep slopes I slip an inch or 2 a minute.

I can ride side saddle on my L3200 to run my turning brakes if needed. Its annoying & uncomfortable but easily doable.
 
/ Shuttle versus HST #60  
I am in the market for a new tractor. Currently have around 32 acres of fields to brush hog, want to plant some food plots, and I am putting in a ~1100 ft gravel driveway. After reading a lot of post I figured I needed to be in the 35-45hp range for a tractor and want one that comes with a FEL. With prices and considering the dealers, I have narrowed it down to the Kioti DK40 or DK45. They have 2 in stock, the DK40 is a shuttle shift and the DK45 is the HST, both have FELs that come with them.

Given mostly will be using this for what I posted in the first sentence, what are the advantages/disadvantages to each of these? Besides the obvious that the shuttle is more manual.

BTW...pricing given to me today was $22K for the DK40 and $25K for the DK45.

Thanks!
I have owned both (shuttle & HST) in my 2 kioti tractors.Hands down the HST is the winner.
 

Marketplace Items

6ft. American Metal Rooster Lawn Art (A61569)
6ft. American...
2014 John Deere 350G Hydraulic Excavator (A60352)
2014 John Deere...
New/Unused Landhonor Air Impact Wrench (A61166)
New/Unused...
35in AIM Tooth Excavator Bucket (A60352)
35in AIM Tooth...
UNUSED KUBOTA M1886-96" QUICK ATTACH BUCKET (A62130)
UNUSED KUBOTA...
2022 WABASH DVSVHPC 53X102 T/A DRY VAN TRAILER (A59909)
2022 WABASH...
 
Top