For those who have faith in the "97% of climate scientists believe global warming..." I suggest you consider this:
Global warming is not settled science: Guest opinion | OregonLive.com
Points out that there is a big difference between "basic science" and "consensus science" and that the consensus has often been wrong--which gets the deniers Nobel prizes. Real science, basic science, welcomes those who question things because they force weaknesses to be tested, if the hypothesis is then verified it strengthens the argument. Consensus "science" attacks those who question the hypothesis because their belief can not be tested and proven so they can only argue based on faith. In the case of climate science, they rely heavily on models and can't test their hypotheses. We'll only know for sure in a few decades.