duke7595
Gold Member
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2012
- Messages
- 365
- Location
- S/W MO.
- Tractor
- 820 ,1520,1020 (D) 1020 (G) 1050,4020 2240
I have a question for TRIPLE R ,
You make a valid point about a Off duty cop taking the suspects into custody with out any shooting.
Case scenario; Two men rob a bank, they exit onto a crowed street guns in hand, off duty cop witnesses the robbers . Cop is with in 30 feet of them he Identifies himself as a policeman he also has his weapon in hand and orders them to drop their weapons he then takes cover behind a mail drop box, the robbers open fire on the cop what should he do ?
!. Return fire ?
2. Don't return fire ?
3. Don't Identify himself as a off duty cop and keep the robbers under
surveillance while calling 911 and giving Intel on the suspects every move ?
Back to the waffle house shooting. The shooter is a customer in a public place where there are a number of innocent people.
Any good cop worth his salt would not engage while in the waffle house if at all practical. He would wait until the suspects leave the waffle house, unless there is a strong possibility that one or both suspects intend to harm someone.
Remember this is a off duty cop trained to react properly to this kind of situation. If shots were fired inside the waffle house it is more then likely the other customers would have been injured or killed . It so happened that only the suspect was killed.
A policeman is trained to never engage where there is a chance of innocent people being harmed . Money is replaceable human lives are not.
The scenario about the bank robbery is a true story it occurred in New Jersey in a business district and the street was crowded with people. If a single shot would have been fired a civilian would have been hit.
I chose # 3 and followed the suspects and they were apprehended without anyone being hurt. I am a retired State Policeman (Trooper) and now live in Missouri.
I felt compelled to share this story because of the waffle house incident, we have many citizens carrying weapons, and we must be responsible for are actions.
Sincerely, Duke
You make a valid point about a Off duty cop taking the suspects into custody with out any shooting.
Case scenario; Two men rob a bank, they exit onto a crowed street guns in hand, off duty cop witnesses the robbers . Cop is with in 30 feet of them he Identifies himself as a policeman he also has his weapon in hand and orders them to drop their weapons he then takes cover behind a mail drop box, the robbers open fire on the cop what should he do ?
!. Return fire ?
2. Don't return fire ?
3. Don't Identify himself as a off duty cop and keep the robbers under
surveillance while calling 911 and giving Intel on the suspects every move ?
Back to the waffle house shooting. The shooter is a customer in a public place where there are a number of innocent people.
Any good cop worth his salt would not engage while in the waffle house if at all practical. He would wait until the suspects leave the waffle house, unless there is a strong possibility that one or both suspects intend to harm someone.
Remember this is a off duty cop trained to react properly to this kind of situation. If shots were fired inside the waffle house it is more then likely the other customers would have been injured or killed . It so happened that only the suspect was killed.
A policeman is trained to never engage where there is a chance of innocent people being harmed . Money is replaceable human lives are not.
The scenario about the bank robbery is a true story it occurred in New Jersey in a business district and the street was crowded with people. If a single shot would have been fired a civilian would have been hit.
I chose # 3 and followed the suspects and they were apprehended without anyone being hurt. I am a retired State Policeman (Trooper) and now live in Missouri.
I felt compelled to share this story because of the waffle house incident, we have many citizens carrying weapons, and we must be responsible for are actions.
Sincerely, Duke